Aim. Assessment of WNT1, WNT3a, and LRP6 concentrations in patients with ischemic heart disease (IHD) and obstructive and non-obstructive coronary artery (CA) disease.

Material and methods. This cross-sectional observational study included 50 IHD patients (verified by coronary angiography, CAG), of which 25 (50%) were men, mean age 64.9±8.1 years; 20 patients had non-obstructive CA disease (stenosis <50%), and 30 patients had hemodynamically significant stenosis. Concentrations of WNT1, WNT3a and LRP6 were measured in all patients.

Results. The concentrations of WNT1 and WNT3a proteins were significantly higher in patients with IHD and obstructive CA disease (p < 0.001), while the concentration of LRP6 was higher in the group with non-obstructive CA disease (p = 0.016). Data analysis of the group with obstructive CA disease showed a moderate correlation between WNT1 and LRP6 (ρ=0.374; p=0.042). Correlation analysis of all groups of patients with CA disease revealed a moderate association between the concentrations of WNT1 and uric acid (ρ=0.416; p=0.007). Regression analysis showed that risk factors for the development of IHD, such as increased body mass index, age, smoking, dyslipidemia, and hypertension, did not significantly influence the type of CA disease in IHD patients. According to ROC analysis, the obstructive form of IHD was predicted by a WNT3a concentration higher than 0.155 ng/ml and a LRP6 concentration lower than 12.94 ng/ml.

Conclusion. IHD patients with non-obstructive CA disease had the greatest increase in LRP6, while patients with obstructive CA disease had significantly higher concentrations of the canonical WNT cascade proteins, WNT1 and WNT3a. According to the ROC analysis, a WNT3a concentration >0.155 ng/ml can serve as a predictor for the presence of hemodynamically significant CA stenosis in IHD patients (sensitivity 96.7%; specificity 70%), whereas a LRP6 concentration >12.94 ng/ml can predict the development of non-obstructive CA disease (sensitivity 76.7%; specificity 65%).

Aim. Retrospective analysis of the underlying causes for death of patients who did and did not seek outpatient medical care (OPMC) for ischemic heart disease (IHD), and discussion of a possibility for using administrative anonymized but individualized databases for analysis.

Material and methods. The electronic database of the Central Administration of the Civil Registry Office of the Moscow Region (Unified State Register of the Civil Registry Office of the Moscow Region), including medical death certificates (MDC) for 2021, was used to select all cases of fatal outcomes with the disease codes of the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) (codes of external causes, injuries, poisonings excluded) that were indicated as the primary cause of death (PCD). Personalized data of the deceased were combined with data from electronic medical records of patients who sought OPMC at institutions of the Moscow Region within up to 2 years before death. In addition to IHD, the following PCD codes were taken into account: malignant tumors, COVID-19, diabetes mellitus, cerebrovascular diseases, hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, alcohol-associated diseases, and, as examples of unspecified PCD, old age and unspecified encephalopathy.

Results In total, among those who died from diseases, the proportion of those who died from IHD was 18.9%; for another 8.4%, IHD was indicated as a comorbid disease in Part II of the MDC. Among those who sought OPMC for IHD, the IHD proportion indicated as PCD was 27.5%, and among those who did not seek OPMC 17.4% (p <0.0001). Those who died from IHD and who had sought OPMC were older (mean age, 75.59 ± 10.94 years) than those who died from IHD and had not sought OMPM (mean age, 73.96 ± 10.94 years; p < 0.0001). The frequency of myocardial infarction as PCD among those who had and had not sought OPMC was the same (12%), chronic forms of IHD were 83.9% and 79.7%, the frequencies of “unspecified” acute forms of IHD (codes I24.8-9) were 4.1% and 8.3%, respectively. The proportion of deaths from COVID-19 was the highest (21.7% and 24.3%, respectively), from malignant neoplasms 11.6% and 12.7%, respectively, and from unspecified encephalopathy 10.6% and 10.7%, respectively.

Conclusion. Only 25% of patients who had sought OPMC for IHD died from IHD, otherwise the causes of death were the same as for patients who had not sought OPMC for IHD. Analysis of administrative databases allows identifying disparities in the PCD structure and to direct the efforts of specialists to reconciling the criteria for death from various forms of IHD.

The extensive use of therapeutic doses of heparin to prevent thrombosis in critically ill patients with COVID-19 during the pandemic has led to an increased incidence of bleeding and heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). In addition, the introduction of the AstraZeneca and Johnson&Johnson vaccines against COVID-19 into clinical practice was associated with the development of a rare but very severe, adverse thrombotic complication, vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT). Thrombotic complications of VITT turned out to be similar to HIT both clinically and pathophysiologically. HIT is a potentially fatal immune-mediated adverse drug response that results in emergence of antibodies that activate platelets in the presence of heparin. HIT is characterized by a high incidence of venous and arterial thromboses, often with fatal outcomes. Currently, there are clearly defined international guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment and prevention of HIT. In case of thrombotic complications, non-heparin anticoagulants should be used.

Based on a clinical case report, the article shows the individual selection of effective therapy for a patient with arterial hypertension and dyslipidemia. Taking into account the risk factors for cardiovascular diseases, Equamer® was selected as a fixed combination of amlodipine + lisinopril + rosuvastatin capsules 10 mg+20 mg+10 mg (Gedeon Richter Plc, Budapest, Hungary). In the patient with hypertension, ischemic heart disease was verified, and stenting of the anterior descending artery was performed. According to the clinical guidelines, when arterial hypertension is associated with ischemic heart disease, the drug therapy of choice should be a combination of dihydropyridine slow calcium channel blockers with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor. The fixed triple combination of amlodipine, lisinopril, and rosuvastatin is one of the most appropriate in this clinical situation; this combination targets the two major risk factors for cardiovascular diseases, arterial hypertension and dyslipidemia.

Significant advances in timely diagnosis and modern antitumor therapy have led to a considerable increase in the survival rate of cancer patients. On the other hand, the incidence of cardiovascular (CV) diseases and their complications is increasingly growing, including due to side effects of anticancer drugs. CV complications are the most common cause of non-oncological death of cancer patients. The development of polychemotherapy-induced arterial hypertension (AH) is closely associated with the use of certain groups of drugs, for example, inhibitors of vascular endothelial growth factor (iVEGF). Such AH is generally dose-dependent and reversible after interruption or termination of treatment. However, systemic AH, regardless of its genesis, is one of the key risk factors for many CV events (myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, arrhythmias) and kidney disease. Therefore, thorough blood pressure monitoring and its timely and adequate correction if needed are indicated when using certain groups of chemotherapy drugs. This article describes a clinical follow-up of a patient with induced AH associated with the iVEGF antitumor therapy for advanced uterine cancer with a rapid development of left ventricular myocardial dysfunction.

Abstracts of the National Congress with International Participation “Heart Failure 2023”. Moscow, December 8-9, 2023