ВАЖНО! Правила приравнивания журналов, входящих в международные базы данных к журналам перечня ВАК.
Ответ на официальный запрос в ВАК журнала Кардиология.

Preview

The Association of Lipoprotein(a), Apolipoprotein(a) Phenotypes and Autoantibodies to Lipoprotein(a) With Lower Extremity Artery Disease

https://doi.org/10.18087/cardio.2018.12.10176

Abstract

Aim. Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] and low molecular weight (LMW) apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] phenotype are risk factors of сoronary heart disease and stroke. Data about the role of Lp(a) and phenotypes apo(a) in the development of lower extremity artery disease (LEAD) is scarce. The aim of our study was to assess the association of Lp(a), apo(a) phenotypes and autoantibodies to apolipoprotein B100 (apoB100) lipoproteins with LEAD.

Materials and methods. The study included 622 patients (386 male and 236 female, average age 61±12 years), examined in the Department of Atherosclerosis of National Medical Research Center of Cardiology. Patients were divided into 2 groups: the main group included 284 patients with LEAD, 338 patients without significant atherosclerosis of coronary, carotid and lower limbs arteries formed the control group. LEAD was diagnosed as atherosclerotic lesions with at least one stenosis of low limb artery ≥50 % and ankle­brachial index ≤0.9. The concentration of Lp(a), lipids was measured in blood serum of all the patients, level of autoantibodies to apoB100 lipoproteins was measured in 247 patients, and apo(a) phenotypes were determined in 389 patients.

Results. Patients with LEAD were older, were more frequently male, and had a greater prevalence of risk factors including hypertension, type 2 diabetes, smoking than the control group patients (p<0.001 in all the cases). The level of Lp(a) was significantly higher in the main group compared to control group: 35 [14; 67] mg / dl vs. 14 [5; 32] mg / dl, p<0,001. ROC analysis demonstrated that the level of Lp(a) ≥26 mg / dl was associated with LEAD (sensitivity 61 %, specificity 70 %). The prevalence of Lp(a) ≥26 mg / dl and LMW apo(a) phenotype were higher in the main group in comparison with the control group: 61 % vs. 30 % and 48 % vs. 26 % respectively (p<0.001 in the both cases). The odds ratio of LEAD in the presence of Lp(a) ≥26 mg / dl was 3.7 (95 % confidence interval (CI), 2.6–5.1, p<0.001) and in the presence of LMW apo(a) phenotype was 2.6 (95 % CI, 1.7–4.0, p<0.001). In logistic regression analysis adjusted for age, sex, hypertension, smoking, diabetes, both Lp(a) and LMW apo(a) phenotype were independent predictors of LEAD when included separately. The level of IgM autoantibodies to Lp(a) was significantly higher in the control group compared to the patients with LEAD (p=0.01). Concentration of IgG autoantobodies to Lp(a) and LDL in the plasma did not differ essentially in the both groups.

Conclusion. The level of Lp(a) ≥26 mg / dl and LMW apo(a) phenotype are independent predictors of LEAD, whereas the contribution of autoantobodies to Lp(a) in LEAD development is controversial.

About the Authors

N. A. Tmoyan
National Medical Research Center of Cardiology of MoH of Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Tmoyan Narek A. – PhD.

Moscow



O. I. Afanasieva
National Medical Research Center of Cardiology of MoH of Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Moscow



E. A. Klesareva
National Medical Research Center of Cardiology of MoH of Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Moscow



M. I. Afanasieva
National Medical Research Center of Cardiology of MoH of Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Moscow



O. A. Razova
National Medical Research Center of Cardiology of MoH of Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Moscow



M. V. Ezhov
National Medical Research Center of Cardiology of MoH of Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Moscow



S. N. Pokrovsky
National Medical Research Center of Cardiology of MoH of Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Moscow



References

1. Fowkes F. G., Rudan D., Rudan I. et al. Comparison of global estimates of prevalence and risk factors for peripheral artery disease in 2000 and 2010: a systematic review and analysis. Lancet 2013;382 (9901):1329-1340. doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(l3)61249-0

2. Kumbhani D.J., Steg P. G., Cannon C. P. et al.; REACH Registry Investigators. Statin therapy and long-term adverse limb outcomes in patients with peripheral artery disease: insights from the REACH registry. Eur Heart J 2014;35 (4l):2864-2872. doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehu080

3. Jones W. S., Baumgartner I., Hiatt W. R. et al.; International Steering Committee and Investigators of the EUCLID Trial. Ticagrelor Compared With Clopidogrel in Patients With Prior Lower Extremity Revascularizationfor Peripheral Artery Disease. Circulation 2017;135 (3):241-250. doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.116.025880

4. Gerhard-Herman M. D., Gornik H. L., Barrett C. et al. 2016 AHA/ ACC Guideline on the Management of Patients With Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2017;135 (12):e726-e779. doi.org/10.1161/cir.0000000000000471

5. Hirsch A. T., Criqui M. H., Treat-Jacobson D. et al. Peripheral arterial disease detection, awareness, and treatment in primary care. JAMA 2001;286 (11):Ш7-Ш4. doi.org/10.1001/jama.286.11.1317

6. Aboyans V., Ricco J. B., Bartelink M. E. L. et al.; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2017 ESC Guidelines on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Diseases, in collaboration with the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS): Document covering atherosclerotic disease of extracranial carotid and vertebral, mesenteric, renal, upper and lower extremity arteriesEnd-orsed by: the European Stroke Organization (ESO) The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS). Eur Heart J 2018;39 (9):763-816. doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehx095

7. Kronenberg F., Utermann G. Lipoprotein(a): Resurrected by genetics. J Intern Med 2013;273 (1):6-30. doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2796.2012.02592.x

8. Erqou S., Kaptoge S., Perry P. L. et al. Lipoprotein(a) concentration and the risk of coronary heart disease, stroke, and nonvascular mortality. JAMA 2009;302 (4):412-423. doi.org/10.1001/jama.2009.1063

9. Erqou S., Thompson A., Di Angelantonio E. et al. Apolipoprotein(a) isoforms and the risk of vascular disease: systematic review of 40 studies involving 58,000 participants. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;55 (19):2160-2167. doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2009.10.080

10. Prasad A., Clopton P., Ayers C. et al. Relationship of Autoantibodies to MDA-LDL and ApoB-Immune Complexes to Sex, Ethnicity, Subclinical Atherosclerosis, and Cardiovascular Events. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2017;37 (6):1213-1221. doi.org/10.1161/atvbaha.117.309101

11. Dahlen G. H. Incidence ofLp(a) among populations. In: Scanu A. M., editor. Lipoprotein(a). New York: Academic Press 1990;151-173.

12. Afanasieva O. I., Adamova I. Yu., Benevolenskaya G. F., Pokrovsky S. N. An immunoenzyme method for determining lipoprotein(a). Bull Exp Biol Med 1995;120 (10):398-401. Russian doi.org/10.1007/bf02444976

13. Afanasieva O. I., Ezhov M. V., Afanasieva M. I. et al. Correlations of low molecular weight phenotype of apoprotein(a) and serum level of lipoprotein(a) with multifocal atherosclerosis in patients with coronary heart disease. Rational Pharmacotherapy in Cardiology 2010;6 (4):474-480. Russian doi.org/10.20996/1819-6446-2010-6-4-474-480

14. Kraft H. G., Lingenhel A., Kochl S. et al. Apolipoprotein(a) kringle IV repeat number predicts risk for coronary heart disease. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 1996;16 (6):713-719. doi.org/10.1161/01.atv.16.6.713

15. Afanasieva O. I., Klesareva Ye. A., Yefremov Ye. Ye. et al. The immune-enzyme analysis based on chimeric molecule and oligopeptide fragmentations to detect autoantibodies to pj-adrenergic receptor in patients with dilation cardiomyopathy. Clin Lab Diagn J 2013;4:24-27. Russian

16. Piepoli M. F., Hoes A. W., Agewall S. et al.; Authors/Task Force Members. 2016 European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: The Sixth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice (constituted by representatives of 10 societies and by invited experts) Developed with the special contribution of the European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation (EACPR). Eur Heart J 2016;37 (29):2315-2381. doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehw106

17. Criqui M. H., Langer R. D., Fronek A. et al. Mortality over a period of 10 years in patients with peripheral arterial disease. N Engl J Med 1992;326 (6):381-386. doi.org/10.1056/nejm199202063260605

18. Bonaca M. P., Nault P., Giugliano R. P. et al. Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Lowering With Evolocumab and Outcomes in Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease: Insights From the FOURIER Trial (Further Cardiovascular Outcomes Research With PCSK9 Inhibition in Subjects With Elevated Risk). Circulation 2018;137 (4):338-350. doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.117.032235

19. Kamstrup P. R., Tybjaerg-Hansen A., Steffensen R., Nordestgaard B. G. Genetically elevated lipoprotein(a) and increased risk of myocardial infarction. JAMA 2009;301 (22):2331-2339. doi.org/10.1001/jama.2009.801

20. Ezhov M. V., Afanas'eva O. I., Benevolenskaia G. F. et al. Association of lipoprotein(a) and apolipoprotein(a) phenotypes with coronary and carotid atherosclerosis in CHD men. Ter Arkh 2000;72 (1):28-32. Russian

21. van Buuren F., Sommer J. A., Kottmann T. et al. Extracardiac manifestation of elevated lipoprotein(a) levels-cumulative incidence of peripheral arterial disease and stenosis of the carotid artery. Clin Res Cardiol Suppl 2015;10:39-45. doi.org/10.1007/s11789-015-0069-x

22. Laschkolnig A., Kollerits B., Lamina C. et al. Lipoprotein(a) concentrations, apolipoprotein(a) phenotypes, and peripheral arterial disease in three independent cohorts. Cardiovasc Res 2014;103 (1):28-36. doi.org/10.1093/cvr/cvu107

23. Berard A. M., Bedel A., Le Trequesser R. et al. Novel risk factors for premature peripheral arterial occlusive disease in non-diabetic patients: a case-control study. PLoS One 2013;8 (3):e37882. doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0037882

24. Gurdasani D., Sjouke B., Tsimikas S. et al. Lipoprotein(a) and risk of coronary, cerebrovascular, and peripheral artery disease: the EPIC-Norfolk prospective population study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2012;32 (12):3058-3065. doi.org/10.1161/atvbaha.112.255521

25. Dieplinger B., Lingenhel A., Baumgartner N. et al. Increased serum lipoprotein(a) concentrations and low molecular weight phenotypes of apolipoprotein(a) are associated with symptomatic peripheral arterial disease. Clin Chem 2007;53 (7):1298-1305. doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2007.088013

26. Kyaw T., Tipping P., Bobik A., Toh B. H. Protective role of natural IgM-producing B1a cells in atherosclerosis. Trends Cardiovasc Med 2012;22 (2):48-53. doi.org/10.1016/j.tcm.2012.06.011

27. Kyaw T., Tay C., Khan A. et al. Conventional B2 B cell depletion ameliorates whereas its adoptive transfer aggravates atherosclerosis. J Immunol 2010;185 (7):4410-4419. doi.org/10.4049/jimmu-nol.1000033

28. Afanasievа O. I., Pylaeva E. A., Klesareva E. A. et al. Lipoprotein(a), its autoantibodies, and circulating T lymphocyte subpopulations as independent risk factors for coronary artery atherosclerosis. Ter Arkh 2016;88 (9):31-38. Russian doi.org/10.17116/terarkh201688931-38

29. Afanas'eva O. I., Klesareva E. A., Levashev P. A. et al. Autoantibodies against lipoprotein(a) in patients with coronary heart disease. Kardiologiia 2014;54 (6):4-8. Russian doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2014.05.479


Review

For citations:


Tmoyan N.A., Afanasieva O.I., Klesareva E.A., Afanasieva M.I., Razova O.A., Ezhov M.V., Pokrovsky S.N. The Association of Lipoprotein(a), Apolipoprotein(a) Phenotypes and Autoantibodies to Lipoprotein(a) With Lower Extremity Artery Disease. Kardiologiia. 2018;58(12):45-51. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18087/cardio.2018.12.10176

Views: 1771


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0022-9040 (Print)
ISSN 2412-5660 (Online)