Значение эхокардиографии с контрастным усилением левых камер сердца в клинической практике
https://doi.org/10.18087/cardio.2018.11.10198
- Р Р‡.МессенРТвЂВВВВВВВВжер
- РћРТвЂВВВВВВВВнокласснРСвЂВВВВВВВВРєРСвЂВВВВВВВВ
- LiveJournal
- Telegram
- ВКонтакте
- РЎРєРѕРїРСвЂВВВВВВВВровать ссылку
Полный текст:
Аннотация
Обзор литературы посвящен возможностям эхокардиографии (ЭхоКГ) с контрастным усилением (КУ) для оценки структуры и функции левых камер сердца. Обсуждаются основные показания к проведению ЭхоКГ-КУ на основе современных рекомендаций. Анализируются возможности ЭхоКГ-КУ в оценке перфузии миокарда левого желудочка, выявлении ишемии миокарда и жизнеспособности миокарда. Приводятся данные о безопасности ЭхоКГ-КУ и о возможных побочных эффектах при использования ультразвуковых контрастов.
Об авторе
М. Н. Алехин
ФГБУ «Центральная клиническая больница с поликлиникой» УД Президента России, Москва, Россия
Россия
Россия
Список литературы
1. Kurt M., Shaikh K. A., Peterson L. et al. Impact of contrast echocardiography on evaluation of ventricular function and clinical management in a large prospective cohort. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;53 (9):802-810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2009.01.005.
2. Gramiak R., Shah P. M. Echocardiography of the aortic root. Invest Radiol 1968;3 (5):356-366.
3. Eskandari M., Monaghan M. Contrast echocardiography in daily clinical practice. Herz 2017;42 (3):271-278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00059-017-4533-x.
4. Senior R., Becher H., Monaghan M. et al.; EACVI Scientific Documents Committee for 2014-16 and 2016-18; EACVI Scientific Documents Committee for 2014-16 and 2016-18. Clinical practice of contrast echocardiography: recommendation by the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) 2017. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2017; 18 (11): 1205-1205af. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jex182.
5. Costa J. M., Tsutsui J. M., Nozawa E. et al. Contrast echocardiography can save nondiagnostic exams in mechanically ventilatedpa-tients. Echocardiography 2005;22 (5):389-394.
6. Kitzman D. W., Goldman M. E., Gillam L. D. et al. Efficacy and safety of the novel ultrasound contrast agent perflutren (definity) in patients with suboptimal baseline left ventricular echocardio-graphic images. Am J Cardiol 2000;86 (6):669-674.
7. Ponikowski P., Voors A. A., Anker S. D. et al.; Authors/Task Force Members; Document Reviewers. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: The Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur J Heart Fail 2016;18 (8):891-975. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.592.
8. ZamoranoJ. L., Lancellotti P., Rodriguez Munoz D. et al.; Authors/Task Force Members; ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines (CPG); Document Reviewers. 2016 ESC Position Paper on cancer treatments and cardiovascular toxicity developed under the auspices of the ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines: The Task Force for cancer treatments and cardiovascular toxicity of the European Society ofCardiology (ESC). EurJ Heart Fail 2017;19 (l):9-42. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.654.
9. Johri A. M., Picard M. H., Newell J. et al. Can a teaching intervention reduce interobserver variability in LVEF assessment: a quality control exercise in the echocardiography lab. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2011;4 (8):821-829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2011.06.004.
10. Hoffmann R., Barletta G., von Bardeleben S. et al. Analysis of left ventricular volumes and function: a multicenter comparison of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, cine ventriculography, and unenhanced and contrast-enhanced two-dimensional and threedimensional echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2014;27 (3):292-301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2013.12.005.
11. Saloux E., Labombarda F., Pellissier A. et al. Diagnostic value of three-dimensional contrast-enhanced echocardiography for left ventricular volume and ejection fraction measurement in patients with poor acoustic windows: a comparison of echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2014;27 (10):1029-1040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2014.06.006.
12. Larsson M. K., Da Silva C., Gunyeli E. et al. The potential clinical value of contrast-enhanced echocardiography beyond current recommendations. Cardiovasc Ultrasound 2016;14:2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12947-015-0045-0.
13. Meng Q Lai H., Lima J. et al. Echocardiographic and pathologic characteristics of primary cardiac tumors: a study of 149 cases. Int J Cardiol 2002;84 (1):69-75.
14. Bernier M., Abdelmoneim S. S., Stuart Moir W. et al. CUTE-CV: a prospective study of enhanced left atrial appendage visualization with microbubble contrast agent use during transesophageal echocardiography guided cardioversion. Echocardiography 2013;30 (9):1091-1097. https://doi.org/10.1111/echo.12240.
15. Jung P. H., Mueller M., Schuhmann C. et al. Contrast enhanced transesophageal echocardiography in patients with atrial fibrillation referred to electrical cardioversion improves atrial thrombus detection and may reduce associated thromboembolic events. Cardiovasc Ultrasound 20137;11 (1):1. https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-7120-11-1.
16. Seol S. H., Lindner J. R. A primer on the methods and applications for contrast echocardiography in clinical imaging. J Cardiovasc Ultrasound 2014;22 (3):101-110. https://doi.org/10.4250/jcu.2014.22.3.101.
17. Shimoni S., Frangogiannis N. G., Aggeli C.J. et al. Identification of hibernating myocardium with quantitative intravenous myocardial contrast echocardiography: comparison with dobutamine echocardiography and thallium-201 scintigraphy. Circulation 2003;107 (4):538-544.
18. Choi E. Y., Seo H. S., Park S. et al. Prediction of transmural extent of infarction with contrast echocardiographically derived index of myocardial blood flow and myocardial blood volume fraction: comparison with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2006;19 (10):1211-1219.
19. Janardhanan R., Moon J. C., Pennell D. J., Senior R. Myocardial contrast echocardiography accurately reflects transmurality of myocardial necrosis and predicts contractile reserve after acute myocardial infarction. Am Heart J 2005;149 (2):355-362.
20. Hickman M., Chelliah R., Burden L., Senior R. Resting myocardial blood flow, coronary flow reserve, and contractile reserve in hibernating myocardium: implications for using resting myocardial contrast echocardiography vs. dobutamine echocardiography for the detection of hibernating myocardium. Eur J Echocardiogr 2010; 11 (9):756-762. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejechocard/jeq062.
21. Senior R., Swinburn J. M. Incremental value of myocardial contrast echocardiography for the prediction of recovery of function in dobutamine nonresponsive myocardium early after acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 2003;91 (4):397-402.
22. Greaves K., Dixon S. R., Fejka M. et al. Myocardial contrast echocardiography is superior to other known modalities for assessing myocardial reperfusion after acute myocardial infarction. Heart 2003;89 (2):139-144.
23. Bolognese L., Carrabba N., Parodi G. et al. Impact of microvascular dysfunction on left ventricular remodeling and long-term clinical outcome after primary coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 2004;109 (9):1121-1126.
24. Khumri T. M., Nayyar S., Idupulapati M. et al. Usefulness of myocardial contrast echocardiography in predicting late mortality in patients with anterior wall acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 2006;98 (9):1150-1155.
25. Dwivedi G., Janardhanan R., Hayat S. A. et al. Prognostic value of myocardial viability detected by myocardial contrast echocardiography early after acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50 (4):327-334.
26. Shah B. N., Khattar R. S., Senior R. The hibernating myocardium: current concepts, diagnostic dilemmas, and clinical challenges in the post-STICH era. Eur Heart J 2013;34 (18):1323-1336. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/eht018.
27. Porter T. R., Abdelmoneim S., Belcik J. T. et al. Guidelines for the cardiac sonographer in the performance of contrast echocardiography: a focused update from the American Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2014;27 (8):797-810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2014.05.011.
28. Dodla S., Xie F., Smith M. et al. Real-time perfusion echocardiography during treadmill exercise and dobutamine stress testing. Heart 2010;96 (3):220-225. https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2009.168112.
29. PlanaJ. C., Mikati I. A., Dokainish H. et al. A randomized cross-over study for evaluation of the effect of image optimization with contrast on the diagnostic accuracy of dobutamine echocardiography in coronary artery disease The OPTIMIZE Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2008;1 (2):145-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2007.10.014.
30. Dolan M. S., Gala S. S., Dodla S. et al. Safety and efficacy of commercially available ultrasound contrast agents for rest and stress echocardiography a multicenter experience. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;53 (1):32-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2008.08.066.
31. Gaibazzi N., Rigo F., Reverberi C. Detection of coronary artery disease by combined assessment of wall motion, myocardial perfusion and coronary flow reserve: a multiparametric contrast stress-echocardiography study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2010;23 (12):1242-1250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2010.09.003.
32. Main M. L., Goldman J. H., Grayburn P. A. Thinking outside the “box" - the ultrasound contrast controversy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50 (25):2434-2437.
33. Chong A., Haluska B., Wahi S. Clinical application and laboratory protocols for performing contrast echocardiography. Indian Heart J 2013;65 (3):337-346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ihj.2013.04.002. Epub 2013 Apr 6.
34. Kusnetzky L. L., Khalid A., Khumri T. M. et al. Acute mortality in hospitalized patients undergoing echocardiography with and without anultrasound contrast agent: results in 18,671 consecutive studies. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;51 (17):1704-1706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2008.03.006.
35. Wei K., Mulvagh S. L., Carson L. et al. The safety of deFinity and Optison for ultrasound image enhancement: a retrospective analysis of 78,383 administered contrast doses. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2008;21 (11):1202-1206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2008.07.019.
36. Khawaja O. A., Shaikh K. A., Al-Mallah M. H. Meta-analysis of adverse cardiovascular events associated with echocardiograph-ic contrast agents. Am J Cardiol 2010;106 (5):742-747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.04.034.
37. Timperley J., Mitchell A. R., Thibault H. et al. Safety of contrast dobutamine stress echocardiography: a single center experience. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2005;18 (2):163-167.
38. Douglas P. S., Weyman A. E., Lindner J. R., Wei K. Contrast echocardiography: past, present, and. future? JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2008;1 (1):107-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2007.10.005.
Рецензия
Для цитирования:
Алехин М.Н. Значение эхокардиографии с контрастным усилением левых камер сердца в клинической практике. Кардиология. 2018;58(11):53-62. https://doi.org/10.18087/cardio.2018.11.10198
For citation:
Alekhin M.N. Value of Contrast-Enhanced Echocardiography of Left Cardiac Chambers for Clinical Practice. Kardiologiia. 2018;58(11):53-62. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18087/cardio.2018.11.10198
Просмотров:
1379
ISSN 0022-9040 (Print)
ISSN 2412-5660 (Online)
ISSN 2412-5660 (Online)
Послать статью по эл. почте 
Оставить комментарий 
