Efficacy and Safety of Anticoagulant Therapy in Patients With Various Forms of Atrial Fibrillation After Interventional Treatment. Results of a Three-Year Follow-up
https://doi.org/10.18087/cardio.2022.8.n2046
Abstract
Aim To evaluate efficacy and safety of the anticoagulant therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) during a 36-month follow-up after an interventional treatment.
Material and methods This study included 302 patients aged 29 to 81 years with various forms of AF. Catheter ablation (CA) of AF foci was performed for all patients. The patients were divided into 3 groups: group 1 with paroxysmal AF, group 2 with persistent AF, and group 3 with longstanding persistent AF. Two subgroups were isolated in each group, with effective and ineffective CA. Results of the follow-up were analyzed at 12, 24, and 36 months after discharge from the hospital. The follow-up interview recorded complaints of palpitation attacks, effectiveness of administered CA, compliance with the treatment, adverse clinical outcomes, including thromboembolic complications (TEC), bleeding, and hospitalizations.
Results Efficacy of the interventional treatment for 36 months was 65.3 % in patients with paroxysmal AF, 59.7 % in patients with persistent AF, and 57.1 % in patients with longstanding persistent AF. Patients with paroxysmal AF and effective CA had no adverse events throughout the same period during the antithrombotic treatment (ATT). In contrast, the group with ineffective ablation had both TEC and hemorrhagic complications during the ATT. In the group with persistent AF and effective CA throughout the follow-up period, TECs were less frequent than in the group of ineffective ablations during the ATT treatment. Patients with longstanding persistent AF and effective CA throughout the follow-up period, had no TECs in contrast to patients with ineffective ablation during the ATT treatment. There were no fatal outcomes in patients with effective procedure.
Conclusion A successful CA procedure for AF provides a significant decrease in the risk of ischemic stroke. Furthermore, the invasive strategy does not increase the risk of major and minor bleedings.
About the Authors
O. R. EshmatovRussian Federation
postgraduate, department of Surgical Arrhythmology and Cardiac Pacing
R. E. Batalov
Russian Federation
PhD, senior researcher, department of Surgical Arrhythmology and Cardiac Pacing
E. A. Archakov
Russian Federation
Junior researcher, department of Surgical Arrhythmology and Cardiac Pacing
S. Yu. Usenkov
Russian Federation
PhD, department of Surgical Arrhythmology and Cardiac Pacing
S. V. Popov
Russian Federation
PhD, senior researcher, department of Surgical Arrhythmology and Cardiac Pacing
References
1. Artemenko S.N., Romanov A.B., Turov A.N., Shabanov V.V., Elesin D.A., Yakubov A.A. et al. Comparison of outcomes of ostial and antral pulmonary vein isolation and ganglionated plexus ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation. Journal of arrhythmology. 2012;(68):14–20.
2. Wyse DG. The Euro Heart Survey on atrial fibrillation: a picture and a thousand words. European heart journal. 2005;26(22):2356–57. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi489.
3. Wann LS, Curtis AB, January CT, Ellenbogen KA, Lowe JE, Estes NA et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA/HRS focused update on the management of patients with atrial fibrillation (Updating the 2006 Guideline): a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Heart rhythm. 2011;8(1):157–76. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2010.11.047.
4. Connolly SJ, Ezekowitz MD, Yusuf S, Eikelboom J, Oldgren J, Parekh A et al. Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. The New England journal of medicine. 2009;361(12):1139–51. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0905561.
5. Granger CB, Alexander JH, McMurray JJ, Lopes RD, Hylek EM, Hanna M et al. Apixaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. The New England journal of medicine. 2011;365(11):981–92. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1107039.
6. Patel MR, Mahaffey KW, Garg J, Pan G, Singer DE, Hacke W et al. Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. The New England journal of medicine. 2011;365(10):883–91. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1009638.
7. Revishvili A.Sh., Rzaev F.G., Baimbetov A.K., Rashbaeva G.S. Electrophysiological assessment of outcomes of radiofrequency re-ablation of atrial fibrillation. Journal of arrhythmology. 2009;(57):29–40.
8. Khlynin M.S., Popov S.V., Krivolapov S.N., Batalov R.E. Non-invasive topical diagnostics of heart arrhythmias. Circulation pathology and cardiac surgery. 2014;18(4):96–103.
9. Eshmatov O.R., Batalov R.E., Dragunova M.A., Archakov E.A., Popov S.V. Efficacy and safety of anticoagulant therapy in real clinical practice in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation after interventional treatment. Journal of arrhythmology. 2021;28(3):21–27.
10. Calkins H, Reynolds MR, Spector P, Sondhi M, Xu Y, Martin A et al. Treatment of atrial fibrillation with antiarrhythmic drugs or radiofrequency ablation: two systematic literature reviews and meta-analyses. Circulation. Arrhythmias and electrophysiology. 2009;2(4):349–61. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCEP.108.824789.
11. Batalov R.E., Popov S.V., Egai Yu.V. Treatment of atrial fibrillation (Review). The Siberian medical journal. 2011;26(4-1):8–14.
12. Zavadovsky KV, Saushkin VV, Khlynin MS, Popov SV, Lishmanov YB. Radionuclide assessment of cardiac function and dyssynchrony in children with idiopathic ventricular tachycardia. Pacing and clinical electrophysiology: PACE. 2016;39(11):1213–1224. DOI: 10.1111/pace.12948.
13. Pappone C, Rosanio S, Oreto G, Tocchi M, Gugliotta F, Vicedomini G et al. Circumferential radiofrequency ablation of pulmonary vein ostia: A new anatomic approach for curing atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2000;102(21):2619–28. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.102.21.2619.
14. Khlynin M.S., Popov S.V., Batalov R.E., Usenkov S.Yu., Archakov E.A., Khlynin S.M. Non invasive diagnosis of atrial arrhythmias using the Amikard system. Journal of arrhythmology. 2017;(88):42–45.
15. Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, Arbelo E, Bax JJ, Blomström-Lundqvist C et al. 2020 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS): The Task Force for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) of the ESC. European heart journal. 2021;42(5):373–498. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa612.
16. Kobza R, Hindricks G, Tanner H, Schirdewahn P, Dorszewski A, Piorkowski C et al. Late recurrent arrhythmias after ablation of atrial fibrillation: incidence, mechanisms and treatment. Heart rhythm. 2004;1(6):676–83. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2004.08.009.
17. Revishvili A.Sh., Rzaev F.G., Sopov O.V., Labazanova A.L. Late outcomes of interventional treatment of atrial fibrillation. Journal of arrhythmology. 2012;(68):5–13.
18. Sauer WH, McKernan ML, Lin D, Gerstenfeld EP, Callans DJ, Marchlinski FE. Clinical predictors and outcomes associated with acute return of pulmonary vein conduction during pulmonary vein isolation for treatment of atrial fibrillation. Heart rhythm. 2006;3(9):1024–8. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2006.05.007.
Review
For citations:
Eshmatov O.R., Batalov R.E., Archakov E.A., Usenkov S.Yu., Popov S.V. Efficacy and Safety of Anticoagulant Therapy in Patients With Various Forms of Atrial Fibrillation After Interventional Treatment. Results of a Three-Year Follow-up. Kardiologiia. 2022;62(8):19-26. https://doi.org/10.18087/cardio.2022.8.n2046