ВАЖНО! Правила приравнивания журналов, входящих в международные базы данных к журналам перечня ВАК.
Ответ на официальный запрос в ВАК журнала Кардиология.

Preview

Kardiologiia

Advanced search

Prognostic value of non-traditional lipid parameters: Castelli Risk Index I, Castelli Risk Index II, and triglycerides to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio among patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction during 1‑year follow-up

https://doi.org/10.18087/cardio.2022.9.n2037

Abstract

Aim    Concentrations of classical lipoproteines have a well-established role in non-invasive cardiology. The efficacy of the Castelli Risk Index I (CRI I), Castelli Risk Index II (CRI II), and triglycerides to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (TG / HDL-C) ratio in clinical practice are currently under evaluation. The study aimed to assess the predictive value of CRI I, CRI II and TG / HDL-C for the incidence of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE) and for all-cause mortality during 1‑year follow-up of patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI).
Material and Methods    1,301 patients were enrolled in the study. Associations between CRI I, CRI II, TG / HDL-C and occurrence of MACE and 1‑year mortality were studied. Moreover correlations between CRI I, CRI II, and TG / HDL-C and the severity of coronary artery disease (CAD) were assessed.
Results    MACE occurred in 10.9 % (142) of patients, and 1‑year mortality was 13.4 % (174). None of the evaluated indices appeared to be an independent predictor of MACE in either the entire population or subpopulations, as divided according to the presence of diabetes or CAD diagnosed prior to admission. Furthermore, no dependence between 1‑year mortality and the examined indices was found. Additionally, only a weak correlation between CAD severity and CRI I was observed (R=0.08, p=0.02). No significant correlations for CRI II (p=0.07) and TG / HDL-C (p=0.6) were detected.
Conclusions    CRI I, CRI II and TG / HDL-C should not be used as predictors of MACE or all-cause mortality among patients with NSTEMI. Moreover, these indices do not reflect CAD severity.

About the Authors

Dominika Drwiła
Department of Coronary Disease and Heart Failure, John Paul II Hospital
Poland

MD

Kraków, Poland



Paweł Rostoff
Department of Coronary Disease and Heart Failure, John Paul II Hospital; Department of Coronary Disease and Heart Failure, Institute of Cardiology, Jagiellonian University Medical College
Poland

MD,PhD

Kraków, Poland



Jadwiga Nessler
Department of Coronary Disease and Heart Failure, John Paul II Hospital; Department of Coronary Disease and Heart Failure, Institute of Cardiology, Jagiellonian University Medical College
Poland

MD,PhD

Kraków, Poland



Ewa Konduracka
Department of Coronary Disease and Heart Failure, John Paul II Hospital; Department of Coronary Disease and Heart Failure, Institute of Cardiology, Jagiellonian University Medical College
Poland

MD,PhD

Kraków, Poland

 



References

1.


Review

For citations:


Drwiła D., Rostoff P., Nessler J., Konduracka E. Prognostic value of non-traditional lipid parameters: Castelli Risk Index I, Castelli Risk Index II, and triglycerides to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio among patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction during 1‑year follow-up. Kardiologiia. 2022;62(9):60-66. https://doi.org/10.18087/cardio.2022.9.n2037

Views: 1364


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0022-9040 (Print)
ISSN 2412-5660 (Online)