Value of comparative studies of “real clinical practice” in modern cardiology. Position paper based on the expert council discussion dated 12/18/2020
Yu. N. Belenkov,
G. P. Arutunov,
O. L. Barbarash,
I. B. Bondareva,
S. V. Villevalde,
A. S. Galyavich,
S. R. Gilarevsky,
D. V. Duplyakov,
N. A. Koziolova,
Yu. M. Lopatin,
Yu. V. Mareev,
S. Yu. Martsevich,
E. P. Panchenko,
I. V. Fomin,
I. S. Yavelov,
D. A. Yakhontov https://doi.org/10.18087/cardio.2021.5.n1646
Abstract
On December 18, 2020, an expert council was held with the participation of members of the Russian Society of Cardiology, the Eurasian Association of Ther-apists, the National Society for Atherothrombosis, the National Society for Evi-dence-Based Pharmacotherapy, and the Russian Heart Failure Society. The event was devoted to the discussion of the correct use of research data of "real clinical practice" in decision making.
Keywords
RCT,
real-life clinical practice study,
pseudorandomization,
oral anticoagulants,
propensity match score
Supporting agencies: Acknowledgements. This publication was supported by Senior Medical Advisor of BAYER, A.A. Elovoy-Vronsky.
About the Authors
Yu. N. Belenkov
I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University). Moscow, Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Director of the Ostroumov Clinic of Hospital Therapy
G. P. Arutunov
Russian National Research Medical University named after Pirogov, Moscow, Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Head of the Department of Internal Medicine and General Physiotherapy of the Pediatric Faculty
O. L. Barbarash
Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases, Kemerovo, Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Director, M.D., Prof.
I. B. Bondareva
Russian State University of Peoples' Friendship, Moscow, Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Leading Researcher
S. V. Villevalde
Almazov National Medical Research Center, St. Petersburg, Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
A. S. Galyavich
Kazan State Medical University, Kazan, Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Head of the Department of Faculty Therapy and Cardiology
S. R. Gilarevsky
Russian Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education, Moscow, Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Professor of the Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapy
D. V. Duplyakov
Samara Regional Clinical Cardiological Dispensary, Russia
Samara State Medical University, Samara, Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Deputy Chief Physician for Medical Affair
N. A. Koziolova
Perm State Medical University named after Academician Wagner E.A., Perm, Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Head of the Department of Propedeutics of Internal Diseases No. 2
Yu. M. Lopatin
Volgograd State Medical University, Volgograd, Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Head of the Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery
Yu. V. Mareev
National Medical Research Centre for Therapy and Preventive Medicine, Moscow, Russia
Robertson Centre for Biostatistics, Glasgow, Great Britain
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Senior Researcher
S. Yu. Martsevich
National Medical Research Centre for Therapy and Preventive Medicine, Moscow, Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
M.D., Prof.
E. P. Panchenko
Scientific Medical Research Center of Cardiology, Moscow, Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
M.D., Prof.
I. V. Fomin
Privolzhsky Research Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russia, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Hospital Therapy and General Medical Practice named after V.G. Vogralika
I. S. Yavelov
National Medical Research Centre for Therapy and Preventive Medicine, Moscow, Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
D. A. Yakhontov
Novosibirsk State Medical University, Novosibirsk, Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
M.D., Prof.
References
1. Shah RU. We Don’t Need More Data, We Need the Right Data. Circulation. 2020;142(3):197–8. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.045968
2. Cohen AT, Goto S, Schreiber K, Torp-Pedersen C. Why do we need observational studies of everyday patients in the real-life setting?: Table 1. European Heart Journal Supplements. 2015;17(suppl D):D2–8. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/suv035
3. Filleron T, Kwiatowski F. Le score de propension, une alternative crédible à la randomisation ? Bulletin du Cancer. 2016;103(1):113–22. DOI: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2015.10.012
4. Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB. The Central Role of the Propensity Score in Observational Studies for Causal Effects. Biometrika. 1983;70(1):41. DOI: 10.2307/2335942
5. Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB. Reducing Bias in Observational Studies Using Subclassification on the Propensity Score. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1984;79(387):516. DOI: 10.2307/2288398
6. Bosco JLF, Silliman RA, Thwin SS, Geiger AM, Buist DSM, Prout MN et al. A most stubborn bias: no adjustment method fully resolves confounding by indication in observational studies. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2010;63(1):64–74. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.03.001
7. Sigel E. Ice cream and shark attacks. 2019. [Internet] 2019. Available at: https://bigthink.com/correlation-causation?rebelltitem=2#rebelltitem2?rebelltitem=2
Review
For citations:
Belenkov Yu.N., Arutunov G.P., Barbarash O.L., Bondareva I.B., Villevalde S.V., Galyavich A.S., Gilarevsky S.R., Duplyakov D.V., Koziolova N.A., Lopatin Yu.M., Mareev Yu.V., Martsevich S.Yu., Panchenko E.P., Fomin I.V., Yavelov I.S., Yakhontov D.A. Value of comparative studies of “real clinical practice” in modern cardiology. Position paper based on the expert council discussion dated 12/18/2020. Kardiologiia. 2021;61(5):79-81. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18087/cardio.2021.5.n1646
Views:
966
Email this article 
Post a Comment 
