C-reactive protein and its associations with сardiometabolic risk factors and echocardiographic indicators of heart failure: results of “Know your heart” study in Arkhangelsk
https://doi.org/10.18087/cardio.2020.9.n975
Abstract
Aim To evaluate the relationship between high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) and echocardiographic (EchoCG) indicators of heart failure (HF) among adult population of the North region of Russia.
Material and methods The Know Your Heart transversal study was performed in 2015–2017 on a random sample of adult population of Arkhangelsk aged 35–69 years (n=2381). The exclusion criterion for this study was a concentration of hsCRP >10 mg/l. The group of subclinical inflammation included 686 participants with hsCRP ≥2.0 mg/l; the comparison group consisted of 1158 participants with hsCRP <2.0 mg/l. Analysis included cardiometabolic risk factors, EchoCG indexes of left ventricular (LV) systolic and diastolic function and biomarkers (NT-proBNP, hsTroponin Т, cystatin С). Linear and logistic regressions were used.
Results The group with hsCRP ≥2.0 mg/l had higher rates of arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus, HF, and myocardial infarction in history than the comparison group. The hsCRP level was independently associated with waist circumference (β=0.379, p <0.001), male gender (β=–0.135, p<0.001), smoking (β=0.109, p<0.001), triglycerides (β=0.083, p<0.001), diastolic blood pressure (β=0.082, p<0.001), cystatin C (β=0.082, p<0.001), glycated hemoglobin (β=0.064, p=0.003), and low-density lipoproteins (LDL) (β=0.049, p=0.025). Independent predictors of subclinical inflammation included older age, smoking, abdominal obesity, elevated values of LDL (>3.0 mmol/l), triglycerides (>1.7 mmol/l), and cystatin C (>1.2 mg/l). hsCRP was independently negatively associated with LV ejection fraction, left atrial volume index, ratio of early to late LV diastolic filling velocity (p=0.003, p=0.002, p=0.005, respectively), which reflected the relationship of the increased content of hsCRP with impairment of LV systolic and diastolic function. A relationship between heart remodeling indexes and hsCRP concentration was shown.
Conclusion In a sample of adult population from the North region of Russia, the hsCRP concentration was independently associated with cardiometabolic risk factors and structural and functional changes in the heart detected by EchoCG, which reflects a potential contribution of inflammation to heart remodeling and development of HF.
About the Authors
O. A. MirolyubovaRussian Federation
D.M.S., professor. Cardiologist. Head, Chair of Faculty Therapy of the Northern State Medical University
A. V. Kudryavtsev
Russian Federation
PhD.
Head, Dept. of Innovative Programs,
Central Scientific Research Laboratory
Ass. Professor, Arctic Health Research,
Dept. of Community Medicine,
Faculty of Health Sciences,
E. O. Semchyugova
Russian Federation
Clinical ordinator/ Speciality is Cardiology
S. K. Malyutina
Russian Federation
D.M.S., professor
A. N. Ryabikov
Russian Federation
D.M.S., professor
References
1. Lüscher TF. Inflammation: the new cardiovascular risk factor. European Heart Journal. 2018;39(38):3483–7. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy607
2. Guzik TJ, Libby P. Leaders in Cardiovascular Research: Peter Libby. Cardiovascular Research. 2019;115(6):e61–2. DOI: 10.1093/cvr/cvz069
3. Prati F, Ruscica G, Marco V, Albertucci M. ‘Precision medicine’ and ischaemic heart disease: the stage is set for the new antibody based therapies (lipid lowering and anti-inflammatory). European Heart Journal Supplements. 2019;21(Suppl B):B73–5. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/suz029
4. Gatto L, Marco V, Contarini M, Prati F. Atherosclerosis to predict cardiac events: where and how to look for it. Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine. 2017;18:e154–6. DOI: 10.2459/JCM.0000000000000465
5. Pradhan AD. C-Reactive Protein, Interleukin 6, and Risk of Developing Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. JAMA. 2001;286(3):327–34. DOI: 10.1001/jama.286.3.327
6. Ridker PM. A Test in Context: high-sensitivity C-reactive protein. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2016;67(6):712–23. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.11.037
7. Kones R. Rosuvastatin, inflammation, C-reactive protein, JUPITER, and primary prevention of cardiovascular disease – a perspective. Drug Design, Development and Therapy. 2010;4:383–413. DOI: 10.2147/DDDT.S10812
8. Kardys I, Knetsch AM, Bleumink GS, Deckers JW, Hofman A, Stricker BHCh et al. C-reactive protein and risk of heart failure. The Rotterdam Study. American Heart Journal. 2006;152(3):514–20. DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2006.02.023
9. Everett BM, Cornel JH, Lainscak M, Anker SD, Abbate A, Thuren T et al. Anti-Inflammatory Therapy With Canakinumab for the Prevention of Hospitalization for Heart Failure. Circulation. 2019;139(10):1289–99. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.038010
10. Andreadou I, Cabrera-Fuentes HA, Devaux Y, Frangogiannis NG, Frantz S, Guzik T et al. Immune cells as targets for cardioprotection: new players and novel therapeutic opportunities. Cardiovascular Research. 2019;115(7):1117–30. DOI: 10.1093/cvr/cvz050
11. Kwak B, Ferdinandy P, Hausenloy DJ. Realizing the therapeutic potential of novel cardioprotective therapies: The EU-CARDIOPROTECTION COST Action – CA16225. Conditioning Medicine. 2018;1(3):116–23. [Av. at: https://archive-ouverte.unige.ch/unige:107091]
12. Lefer DJ, Bolli R. Development of an NIH Consortium for PreclinicAl AssESsment of CARdioprotective Therapies (CAESAR): A Paradigm Shift in Studies of Infarct Size Limitation. Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics. 2011;16(3–4):332–9. DOI: 10.1177/1074248411414155
13. Jones SP, Tang X-L, Guo Y, Steenbergen C, Lefer DJ, Kukreja RC et al. The NHLBI-Sponsored Consortium for preclinicAl assESsment of cARdioprotective Therapies (CAESAR): A New Paradigm for Rigorous, Accurate, and Reproducible Evaluation of Putative Infarct-Sparing Interventions in Mice, Rabbits, and Pigs. Circulation Research. 2015;116(4):572– 86. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.305462
14. Sattar N, Gaw A, Scherbakova O, Ford I, O’Reilly DStJ, Haffner SM et al. Metabolic Syndrome With and Without C-Reactive Protein as a Predictor of Coronary Heart Disease and Diabetes in the West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study. Circulation. 2003;108(4):414–9. DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000080897.52664.94
15. Perrone-Filardi P, Paolillo S, Costanzo P, Savarese G, Trimarco B, Bonow RO. The role of metabolic syndrome in heart failure. European Heart Journal. 2015;36(39):2630–4. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv350
16. Cook S, Malyutina S, Kudryavtsev AV, Averina M, Bobrova N, Boytsov S et al. Know Your Heart: Rationale, design and conduct of a cross-sectional study of cardiovascular structure, function and risk factors in 4500 men and women aged 35-69 years from two Russian cities, 2015-18. Wellcome Open Research. 2018;3:67. DOI: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.14619.2
17. Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V, Afilalo J, Armstrong A, Ernande L et al. Recommendations for Cardiac Chamber Quantification by Echocardiography in Adults: An Update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. European Heart Journal – Cardiovascular Imaging. 2015;16(3):233–71. DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jev014
18. Nagueh SF, Smiseth OA, Appleton CP, Byrd BF, Dokainish H, Edvardsen T et al. Recommendations for the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function by echocardiography: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography. 2016;29(4):277– 314. DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2016.01.011
19. Ridker PM, Cushman M, Stampfer MJ, Tracy RP, Hennekens CH. Inflammation, Aspirin, and the Risk of Cardiovascular Disease in Apparently Healthy Men. New England Journal of Medicine. 1997;336(14):973–9. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199704033361401
20. Freeman DJ, Norrie J, Caslake MJ, Gaw A, Ford I, Lowe GDO et al. C-Reactive Protein Is an Independent Predictor of Risk for the Development of Diabetes in the West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study. Diabetes. 2002;51(5):1596–600. DOI: 10.2337/diabetes.51.5.1596
21. Ridker PM. Inflammatory Biomarkers, Statins, and the Risk of Stroke: Cracking a Clinical Conundrum. Circulation. 2002;105(22):2583–5. DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000017822.82512.62
22. Ridker PM. Role of inflammatory biomarkers in prediction of coronary heart disease. The Lancet. 2001;358(9286):946–8. DOI: 10.1016/ S0140-6736(01)06112-8
23. Festa A, D’Agostino R, Tracy RP, Haffner SM. Elevated Levels of Acute-Phase Proteins and Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1 Predict the Development of Type 2 Diabetes: The Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study. Diabetes. 2002;51(4):1131–7. DOI: 10.2337/diabetes.51.4.1131
24. Libby P, Ridker PM, Hansson GK. Progress and challenges in translating the biology of atherosclerosis. Nature. 2011;473(7347):317–25. DOI: 10.1038/nature10146
25. Taglieri N, Koenig W, Kaski JC. Cystatin C and Cardiovascular Risk. Clinical Chemistry. 2009;55(11):1932–43. DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2009.128397
26. Knight EL, Verhave JC, Spiegelman D, Hillege HL, De Zeeuw D, Curhan GC et al. Factors influencing serum cystatin C levels other than renal function and the impact on renal function measurement. Kidney International. 2004;65(4):1416–21. DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.00517.x
27. Stevens LA, Schmid CH, Greene T, Li L, Beck GJ, Joffe MM et al. Factors other than glomerular filtration rate affect serum cystatin C levels. Kidney International. 2009;75(6):652–60. DOI: 10.1038/ki.2008.638
28. Macdonald J, Marcora S, Jibani M, Roberts G, Kumwenda M, Glover R et al. GFR Estimation Using Cystatin C Is Not Independent of Body Composition. American Journal of Kidney Diseases. 2006;48(5):712–9. DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2006.07.001
29. Aimo A, Januzzi JL, Vergaro G, Ripoli A, Latini R, Masson S et al. Prognostic Value of High-Sensitivity Troponin T in Chronic Heart Failure: An Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis. Circulation. 2018;137(3):286–97. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.031560
30. Sharma A, Demissei BG, Tromp J, Hillege HL, Cleland JG, O’Connor CM et al. A network analysis to compare biomarker profiles in patients with and without diabetes mellitus in acute heart failure: Biomarkers in patients with diabetes and heart failure. European Journal of Heart Failure. 2017;19(10):1310–20. DOI: 10.1002/ejhf.912
31. Dinatolo E, Sciatti E, Anker MS, Lombardi C, Dasseni N, Metra M. Updates in heart failure: what last year brought to us. ESC Heart Failure. 2018;5(6):989–1007. DOI: 10.1002/ehf2.12385
32. Mirolubova O.A., Moiseeva A.S., Antonov A.B. Relationships between biomarkers and echocardiography indicators in patients with heart failure with a preserved and moderately reduced ejection fraction. VI global educational forum “Russian cardiovascular days”. 2018;43. Av. at: https://scardio.ru/content/activities/2018/RCD/event_11984_thesises.pdf.2018.
33. Shadrina A.S., Plieva Ya.Z., Kushlinskiy D.N., Morozov A.A., Filipenko M.L., Chang V.L. et al. Classification, regulation of activity, and genetic polymorphism of matrix metalloproteinases in health and disease. Almanac of Clinical Medicine. 2017;45(4):266–79. DOI: 10.18786/2072-0505-2017-45-4-266-279
Review
For citations:
Mirolyubova O.A., Kudryavtsev A.V., Semchyugova E.O., Malyutina S.K., Ryabikov A.N. C-reactive protein and its associations with сardiometabolic risk factors and echocardiographic indicators of heart failure: results of “Know your heart” study in Arkhangelsk. Kardiologiia. 2020;60(9):68-75. https://doi.org/10.18087/cardio.2020.9.n975