Stability of chronic heart failure from the position of a doctor and a patient: in search of contact points

Actuality. The results of the EPOCH study showed that in 16 years in the Russian Federation the number of patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) of I–IV FC increased significantly. The main objectives of the treatment of CHF are the stabilization of the patient's condition and the reduction of the risks of cardiovascular mortality, decompensation and repeated hospitalizations for heart failure. But a single concept of “stable” CHF does not exist either in Russian or in foreign recommendations. Objective. To assess how ofen the subjective assessment of a doctor regarding the stability of a patient with CHF coincides with the subjective opinion of the patient with CHF regarding the stability of his condition; and to identify those parametrs that have a leading influence on the assessment of the stability of the state from the point of view of the physician and the patient. Materials and methods. Data collection was carried out in the form of interviews among general practitioners and cardiologists in outpatient clinics (OC) of Nizhny Novgorod, which were randomly selected by the method of blind envelopes. In parallel, a survey was conducted of patients with CHF who applied for outpatient medical care about this syndrome to this OC, which the doctors were not informed about, because patient interviews were conducted after the end of outpatient admission in a separate room. Answers of doctors about a patient with CHF were compared with the answers of the corresponding patient; for this, a single code was assigned to both questionnaires. The study included 211 patients with CHF of any etiology older than 18 years. The study involved 25 doctors. The study was conducted from 11/01/17 to 11/30/17. Results: Analysis of the data suggests that the doctor is more likely to consider the patient more stable in cases when the patient notes a decrease in the severity of shortness of breath, weakness and does not detect edema, while the fact of therapy with loop diuretics (LD) or an increase in them did not affect assessment of stability from the point of view of the doctor. From the point of view of the patient, the absence of the first three signs also testifies to the stability of the condition, however, unlike doctors, patients more often (p <0.001) considered themselves unstable in those cases when they needed LD therapy or an increase in LD dose. A logit regression analysis and ROC analysis based on selected signs and symptoms of CHF confirmed that a model that combines questions about persistent weakness and edema is best suited to predict the patient’s subjective assessment of patient’s stability from a doctor’s point of view (61.8% of the results can be correctly predicted), and at the cutoff threshold of 0.5, it has the highest sensitivity of 64.9%. To predict the subjective assessment of stability in relation to the patient, the optimal model turned out to be the one that includes answers to the questions of “shortness of breath”, “weakness” and “intake of loop diuretics”, which allows to predict 66.7% of the results correctly at the cut‑off threshold 0, 5 has a better balance of sensitivity and specificity (54.9 and 78.6, respectively). Conclusion. Reducing the severity of dyspnea, weakness and lack of edema of the lower extremities are important signs of the stability of the condition, both in the opinion of the doctor and in the opinion of the patient. Unlike the doctor, the patient is more likely to be classified as unstable in those cases when he is forced to receive therapy with loop diuretics at the outpatient stage or to increase their dose. The model for assessing the stability of a patient with CHF from the point of view of a physician more often allows one to confirm the patient’s stable condition, while the model used by patients more often allows to identify patient instability and worsening of the course of CHF.

1. Fomin I.V. Chronic heart failure in Russian Federation: what do we know and what to do. Russian journal of cardiology. 2016;8:7–13. [Russian: Фомин И.В. Хроническая сердечная недостаточность в Российской Федерации: что сегодня мы знаем и что должны делать. Российский кардиологический журнал. 2016;8:7-13.]. DOI: 10.15829/1560-4071-2016-8-7-13

2. Nikolaeva O.A., Zhirov I.V., Nasonova S.N., Uskach T.M., Goryunova T.V., Tereshchenko S.N. Decompensation of Heart Failure as a Cause Of Hospitalizationof Patients in Specialized Cardiology Hospital: Results of a Monocentric Retrospective Study. Difcult patient. 2016;14 (6–7):21–4. [Russian: Николаева О.А., Жиров И.В., Насонова С.Н., Ускач Т.М., Горюнова Т.В., Терещенко С.Н. Декомпенсация сердечной недостаточности как причина госпитализации пациентов в специализированный кардиологический стационар: результаты одноцентрового ретроспективного исследования. Трудный пациент. 2016;14(6-7):21-4]

3. Fomin I.V., Kraiem N., Polyakov D.S., Vinogradova N.G., Valikulova F.Yu., Vaysberg A.R. et al. The notion of CHF course stability: Is it acceptable for Russian practice? Kardiologiia. 2018;58 (S3):55–63. [Russian: Фомин И.В., Краием Н., Поляков Д.С., Виноградова Н.Г., Валикулова Ф.Ю., Вайсберг А.Р., Щербинина Е.В. Понятие стабильности течения ХСН – приемлемо ли оно для российской практики? Кардиология. 2018;58(S3):55-63]. DOI: 10.18087/cardio.2356

4. Mareev V.Yu., Ageev F.T., Arutyunov G.P., Koroteev A.V., Mareev Yu.V., Ovchinnikov A.G. et al. SEHF, RSC and RSMSIM national guidelines on CHF diagnostics and treatment (fourth revision) Approved at the SEHF Congress on December 7, 2012, at the SEHF Board of Directors meeting on March 31, 2013, and at the RSC Congress on September 25, 2013. Russian Heart Failure Journal. 2013;14 (7):379–472. [Russian: Мареев В.Ю., Агеев Ф.Т., Арутюнов Г.П., Коротеев А.В., Мареев Ю.В., Овчинников А.Г. и др. Национальные рекомендации ОССН, РКО и РНМОТ по диагностике и лечению ХСН (четвертый пересмотр). Утверждены на Конгрессе ОССН 7 декабря 2012 года, на Правлении ОССН 31 марта 2013 и Конгрессе РКО 25 сентября 2013 года. Журнал Сердечная Недостаточность. 2013;14(7):379-472.]. DOI: 10.18087/rhf.2013.7.1860

5. Mareev V.Yu., Fomin I.V., Ageev F.T., Arutiunov G.P., Begrambekova Yu.L., Belenkov Yu.N. et al. Clinical guidelines. Chronic heart failure (CHF). Russian Heart Failure Journal. 2017;18 (1):3–40. [Russian: Мареев В.Ю., Фомин И.В., Агеев Ф.Т., Арутюнов Г.П., Беграмбекова Ю.Л., Беленков Ю.Н. и др. Клинические рекомендации. Хроническая сердечная недостаточность (ХСН). Журнал Сердечная Недостаточность. 2017;18(1):3–40]. DOI: 10.18087/rhf.2017.1.2346

6. Ponikowski P, Voors AA, Anker SD, Bueno H, Cleland JGF, Coats AJS et al. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: The Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Developed with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. European Heart Journal. 2016;37(27):2129–200. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw128

7. Yancy CW, Jessup M, Bozkurt B, Butler J, Casey DE, Drazner MH et al. 2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2013;128(16):e240-327. DOI: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e31829e8776

8. Polyakov D.S., Fomin I.V., Valikulova F.Yu., Vaisberg A.R., Kraiem N., Badin Yu.V. et al. The EPOCH-CHF epidemiological program: decompensated chronic heart failure in real-life clinical practice (EPOCH-D–CHF). Russian Heart Failure Journal. 2016;17 (5):299–305. [Russian: Поляков Д.С., Фомин И.В., Валикулова Ф.Ю., Вайсберг А.Р., Краием Н., Бадин Ю.В. и др. Эпидемиологическая программа ЭПОХА-ХСН: Декомпенсация хронической сердечной недостаточности в реальной клинической практике (ЭПОХА-Д-ХСН). Журнал Сердечная Недостаточность. 2016;17(5):299–305]. DOI: 10.18087/rhf.2016.5.2239

9. Maggioni AP, Anker SD, Dahlström U, Filippatos G, Ponikowski P, Zannad F et al. Are hospitalized or ambulatory patients with heart failure treated in accordance with European Society of Cardiology guidelines? Evidence from 12440 patients of the ESC Heart Failure Long-Term Registry. European Journal of Heart Failure. 2013;15(10):1173–84. DOI: 10.1093/eurjhf/hf134

10. Lutik MLA, Jaarsma T, van Geel PP, Brons M, Hillege HL, Hoes AW et al. Long-term follow-up in optimally treated and stable heart failure patients: primary care vs. heart failure clinic. Results of the COACH-2 study: Longterm follow-up in optimally treated and stable HF patients. European Journal of Heart Failure. 2014;16(11):1241–8. DOI: 10.1002/ejhf.173

11. Lynga P, Persson H, Hägg-Martinell A, Hägglund E, Hagerman I, Langius-Eklöf A et al. Weight monitoring in patients with severe heart failure (WISH). A randomized controlled trial. European Journal of Heart Failure. 2012;14(4):438–44. DOI: 10.1093/eurjhf/hfs023

12. Faris RF, Flather M, Purcell H, Poole-Wilson PA, Coats AJ. Diuretics for heart failure. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2012;2:CD003838. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003838.pub3

13. Tavazzi L, Senni M, Metra M, Gorini M, Cacciatore G, Chinaglia A et al. Multicenter Prospective Observational Study on Acute and Chronic Heart Failure: One-Year Follow-up Results of IN-HF (Italian Network on Heart Failure) Outcome Registry. Circulation: Heart Failure. 2013;6(3):473–81. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.112.000161

14. Arutyunov A.G., Dragunov D.O., Arutyunov G.P., Rylova A.K., Pashkevich D.D., Viter K.V. et al. First open study of syndrome of acute decompensation of heart failure and concomitant diseases in Russian Federation: independent registry ORKUL. Kardiologiia. 2015;55 (5):12–21. [Russian: Арутюнов А.Г., Драгунов Д.О., Арутюнов Г.П., Рылова А.К., Пашкевич Д.Д., Витер К.В. и др. Первое открытое исследование синдрома острой декомпенсации сердечной недостаточности и сопутствующих заболеваний в Российской Федерации. Независимый регистр ОРАКУЛ-РФ. Кардиология. 2015;55(5):12-21]. DOI: 10.18565/cardio.2015.5.12–21

15. McAlister FA. Meta-analysis: β-blocker dose, heart rate reduction, and death in patients with heart failure. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2009;150(11):784–94. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-150-11-200906020-00006

16. Lonn E. Dose response of ACE inhibitors: implications of the SECURE trial. Current Controlled Trials in Cardiovascular Medicine. 2001;2(4):155–9

17. Maggioni AP, Dahlström U, Filippatos G, Chioncel O, Crespo Leiro M, Drozdz J et al. EURObservational Research Programme: regional differences and 1-year follow-up results of the Heart Failure Pilot Survey (ESC-HF Pilot). European Journal of Heart Failure. 2013;15(7):808–17. DOI: 10.1093/eurjhf/hf050

18. Polyakov D.S., Fomin I.V., Vaisberg A.R., Valikulova F.Yu., Kraiem N. Assessment of Impact of Acute Kidney Injury on Prognosis of a Hospitalized Patients With Acute Decompensated Heart Failure. Kardiologiia. 2016;56 (12):40–7. [Russian: Поляков Д.С., Фомин И.В., Вайсберг А.Р., Валикулова Ф.Ю., Краием Н. Оценка влияния острого повреждения почек на прогноз у пациента с острой декомпенсацией сердечной недостаточности в условиях клинической практики. Кардиология. 2016;56 (12):40-7]. DOI: 10.18565/cardio.2016.12.40-47

19. Arutyunov A.G., Rylova A.K., Arutyunov G.P. Registry of hospitalized patients with circulatory decompensation (Pavlov Registry). Report 1. Current clinical characteristics of a patient with circulatory decompensation. Clinical phenotypes of patients. Russian Heart Failure Journal. 2014;15 (1):23–32. [Russian: Арутюнов А.Г., Рылова А.К., Арутюнов Г.П. Регистр госпитализированных пациентов с декомпенсацией кровообращения (Павловской Регистр). Сообщение 1. Современная клиническая характеристика пациента с декомпенсацией кровообращения. Клинические фенотипы пациентов. Журнал Сердечная Недостаточность. 2014;15(1):23-32]

20. Mareev V.Yu., Arutiunov G.P., Astashkin E.I., Vertkin A.L., Glezer M.G., Lopatin Yu.M. et al. Acute decompensated heart failure. Consensus of Russian experts, 2014. Russian Heart Failure Journal. 2014;15 (5):321–36. [Russian: Мареев В.Ю., Арутюнов Г.П., Асташкин Е.И., Вёрткин А.Л., Глезер М.Г., Лопатин Ю.М. и др. Острая декомпенсированная сердечная недостаточность. Согласованная позиция российских экспертов – 2014. Журнал Сердечная Недостаточность. 2014;15(5): 321-36.]. DOI: 10.18087/rhf.2014.5.2024