ВАЖНО! Правила приравнивания журналов, входящих в международные базы данных к журналам перечня ВАК.
Ответ на официальный запрос в ВАК журнала Кардиология.

Preview

Kardiologiia

Advanced search

Vascular Age Concept: Which Approach Is Preferable in Clinical Practice?

https://doi.org/10.18087/cardio.2019.2.10229

Abstract

Aim: to compare various approaches to estimation of vascular age in patients from sample of citizens of Saint-Petersburg (SPB) with arterial pressure (AP) above 130 / 80 mm Hg without history of cardiovascular events.
Materials and methods. Examination of a population sample of SPB citizens (n=1600) was carried out within framework of the observational epidemiological study ESSE-RF (ЭССЕ-РФ) in 2012–2013. We selected from this sample 477 women and man aged 40–65 years without history of cardiovascular events, diabetes, or chronic kidney disease, and AP >130 / 80 mm Hg. Examination included anthropometry, sampling of fasting blood for measurement of lipids, glucose, creatinine levels, urine sampling for determination of albumin excretion, and AP measurement in ac-cordance with standard methods. The SCORE scale was used of evaluation of 10-year risk of fatal stroke and fatal myocardial infarction. Volume sphygmography (VaSera device) was applied for determination of cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI) with calculation of vascular age, and ankle-brachial index. ASCORE scale was used for determination of сalculated vascular age was determined with help of the ASCORE scale.
Results. Mean age of participants (182 men [38.2 %], 295 women [61.8 %]) was 52.5±6.2 years. Calculated and instrumental methods of determination of vascular age and early vascular aging had low concordance (κ = 0.099). With elevation of cardiovascular risk early vascular aging was more frequently detected by method of its calculation ASCORE than with instrumental method (VaSera). In the absence of achievement of target AP level signs of early vascular aging were significantly more often detected by the method of vascular age calculation than by the instrumental method VaSera.
Conclusion. Application of the concept of vascular age and early vascular aging syndrome might be an effective tool for stratification of cardiovascular risk by a physician and improvement of adherence of a patient. This is especially actual for young patients with burdened heredity. One can assume that estimation of virtual risk factor load on blood vessels by the ASCORE method of calculation is more sensitive to detection of premature vascular aging, while requiring less financial and organizational efforts.

About the Authors

O. P. Rotar
Almazov National Medical Research Centre.
Russian Federation
St.‑Petersburg.


A. S. Alieva
Almazov National Medical Research Centre.
Russian Federation
St.‑Petersburg.


M. A. Boiarinova
Almazov National Medical Research Centre.
Russian Federation
St.‑Petersburg.


K. M. Tolkunova
Almazov National Medical Research Centre.
Russian Federation
St.‑Petersburg.


A. O. Konradi
Almazov National Medical Research Centre; Information Technology, Mechanics and Optics University.
Russian Federation
St.‑Petersburg.


References

1. Raised blood pressure/WHO: Global Health Observatory (GHO) data. – [Электронный ресурс] URL: http://www.who.int/gho/ncd/risk_factors/blood_pressure_prevalence_text/en/

2. Piepoli M.F., ESC Scientific Document Group. 2016 European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: The Sixth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice (constituted by representatives of 10 societies and by invited experts) Developed with the special contribution of the European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation (EACPR). European Heart Journal 2016;37(29):2315–2381. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehw106

3. Сardiovascular prevention 2017. National guidelines. Russ J of Cardiology 2018;23(6):7–122. Russian (Кардиоваскулярная профилактика 2017. Российские национальные рекоменда-ции. Российский кардиологический журнал 2018;23(6):7–122). http://dx.doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2018-6-7-122.

4. Lin J., Evans C., Johnson E. et al. Nontraditional Risk Factors in Cardiovascular Disease Risk Assessment Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA 2018;320(3):281–297. DOI:10.1001/jama.2018.4242 Published online July 10, 2018.

5. Whelton P.K., Carey R.M., Aronow W.S. et al. ACC/AHA/AAPA/ ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/ NMA/PCNA guideline for the prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of high blood pressure in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Hypertension 2018;71(6):1269–1324. DOI: 10.1161/HYP.0000000000000066

6. Soureti A., Hurling R., Murray P. et al. Evaluation of a cardiovascular disease risk assessment tool for the promotion of healthier lifestyles. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 2010;17(5):519–23. DOI: 10.1097/HJR.0b013e328337ccd3.

7. Groenewegen K.A., den Ruijter H.M., Pasterkamp G. et al. Vascular age to determine cardiovascular disease risk: A systematic review of its concepts, definitions, and clinical applications. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2016;23(3):264–74. DOI:10. 1177/2047487314566999

8. Prieto-Merino D., Dobson J., Gupta A.K. et al. ASCORE: an uptodate cardiovascular risk score for hypertensive patients reflecting contemporary clinical practice developed using the (ASCOTBPLA) trial data. J Hum Hypertens 2013;27(8):492–496 DOI: 10.1038/jhh.2013.3

9. Cunha P.G., Boutouyrie P., Nilsson P.M. et al. Early Vascular Ageing (EVA): Definitions and Clinical Applicability. Curr Hypertens Rev 2017;13(1):8–15. DOI: 10.2174/1573402113666170413094319

10. Orlov A.V., Rotar O.P., Boiarinova M.A. et al. Gender Differences of Behavioral Risk Factors in Saint-Petersburg Inhabitants. Vestnik Rossiĭskoĭ akademii meditsinskikh nauk 2015;70(5):585–591. Russian (Орлов А.В., Ротарь О.П., Бояринова М.А. и др. Гендерные особенности распространенности поведенческих факторов риска у жителей Санкт-Петербурга. Вестник РАМН 2015;70(5):585–591). DOI: 10.15690/vramn.v70.i5.1446

11. Mancia G., Fagard R., Narkiewicz K. et al. 2013 ESH/ESC Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension The Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). J Hypertens 2013;31(7):1281–357. DOI: 10.1097/01.hjh.0000431740.32696.cc.

12. Chazova I.E., Oshepkova E.V., Zhernakova Yu.V. Diagnostics and treatment of arterial hypertension. Clinical guidelines. Kardiologicheskij Vestnik 2015;10(1):5–30. Russian (Чазова И.Е., Ощепкова Е.В., Жернакова Ю.В. Диагностика и лечение артериальной гипертонии: клинические рекомендации. Кардиологический вестник 2015;10(1):5–30).

13. Conroy R.M., Pyörälä K., Fitzgerald A.P. et al. Estimation of tenyear risk of fatal cardiovascular disease in Europe: the SCORE project. European Heart Journal 2003;24:987–1003. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-668X(03)00114-3

14. Karpov Y.A., Sorokin V.E. Risk assessment in hypertension and vascular age. New tools for the improvement of the treatment quality and the relationships between the doctor and the patient. Atmosphere. News in Cardiology 2015;2:18–24. Russian (Карпов Ю.А., Сорокин В.Е. Оценка риска осложнений при артериальной гипертонии и сосудистый возраст. Новые инструменты для повышения качества лечения и улучшения взаимопонимания врача и больного. Атмосфера. Новости кардиологии 2015;2:18–24.) – [Электронный ресурс]. – URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/otsenka-riska-oslozhneniy-pri-arterialnoygipertonii-i-sosudistyy-vozrast-novye-instrumenty-dlya-povysheniya-kachestva-lecheniya-i/.

15. Soldatenkova N.A., Orlov A.V., Rotar O.P. et al. Early vascular aging: prevalence and predictors in Russian population. Biotechnosfera 2016;2(44):22–28. Russian (Солдатенкова Н.А., Орлов А.В., Ротарь О.П. и др. Раннее сосудистое старение: распространенность и предикторы в российской популяции. Биотехносфера 2016;2(44):22–28).

16. Troitskaya E.A., Velmakin S.V., Kobalava Z.D. Concept of vascular age: new tool in cardiovascular risk assessment. Arterial’naya Gipertenziya 2017;23(2):160–171. Russian (Троицкая Е.А., Вельмакин С.В., Кобалава Ж.Д. Концепция сосудистого возраста: новый инструмент оценки сердечно-сосудистого риска. Артериальная гипертензия 2017;23(2):160–171.) DOI: org/10.18705/1607-419X-2017-23-2-160-171

17. Nilsson P. Vascular age: how can it be determined? What are it’s clinical applications? Medicographia 2015;37:454–460. [Электронный ресурс]. URL:https://www.medicographia.com/2016/08/vascular-age-how-can-it-be-determined-what-areits-clinical-applications/.

18. McEniery C.M. Antihypertensive drugs and central blood pressure Current Hypertension Reports 2009;11(4):253–259. DOI: org/10.1007/s11906-009-0043-4

19. Karpov Y.A., Sorokin E.V. Effects of combination antihypertensive therapy on the cardiovascular risk and vascular age: the results of ADVANT’AGE – a multi-center open-label study. Atmosphere. News in Cardiology 2015;3:2–10. Russian (Карпов Ю.А., Сорокин Е.В. Влияние комбинированной гипотензивной терапии на риск сердечно-сосудистых осложнений и сосудистый возраст: результаты многоцентрового открытого исследования ADVANT’AGE. Атмосфера. Новости кардиологии 2015;3:2–10) – [Электронный ресурс]. – URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/v/vliyanie-kombinirovannoy-gipotenzivnoy-terapii-na-riskserdechno-sosudistyh-oslozhneniy-i-sosudistyy-vozrast-rezultaty.


Review

For citations:


Rotar O.P., Alieva A.S., Boiarinova M.A., Tolkunova K.M., Konradi A.O. Vascular Age Concept: Which Approach Is Preferable in Clinical Practice? Kardiologiia. 2019;59(2):45-53. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18087/cardio.2019.2.10229

Views: 3344


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0022-9040 (Print)
ISSN 2412-5660 (Online)