ВАЖНО! Правила приравнивания журналов, входящих в международные базы данных к журналам перечня ВАК.
Ответ на официальный запрос в ВАК журнала Кардиология.

Preview

Kardiologiia

Advanced search

C-reactive protein evaluation in communityacquired pneumonia with comorbid chronic heart failure as criterion of antibiotic prescription

https://doi.org/10.18087/cardio.2661

Abstract

Aim. To prove that diagnostic algorithm based on additional measurement of serum C-reactive protein (CRP) for administration of systemic antibacterial therapy (ABT) to patients with suspected community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and concomitant chronic heart failure (CHF) does not influence outcomes of disease.

Materials and methods. This open, single-center, randomized, prospective, noninferiority study included 160 adult patients with documented functional class II–IV CHF who had been admitted with a preliminary diagnosis of non-severe CAP. Patients were randomized at 1:1 to two groups; group 1 – with additional measurement of CRP (n=80) and group 2 – with the use of routine diagnostic methods (n=80). In group 1, systemic ABT was administered only when serum CRP was >28.5 mg / l (threshold level of the biomarker calculated at the previous stage of the study); group 2 received a standard treatment. Noninferiority test result for both algorithms was evaluated by the number of patients with clinical success on days 12–14 (primary endpoint). Non-inferiority margin was δ=–13.5 %. In addition secondary endpoints (early clinical response on days 3–5; early in-hospital adverse events (development of complications; admission to intensive care unit (ICU); death), death, recurrent CAP or CHF worsening with readmission at 28 day; mortality at 90 and 180 days) were estimated. Standard statistical tools were used for all intergroup comparisons.

Results: 76 patients of each group reached the primary endpoint. Systemic ABT was administered to 51 (67.1 %) patients in group 1 and 76 (100 %) patients in group 2 (p<0.05). Both groups were comparable (p>0.05) regarding all endpoints: clinical success, 70 (92.1 %) vs. 69 (90.8 %), Δ=1.3 % (one-sided 97.5 % CI: – 8.25 % for non-inferiority margin δ=–13.5 %); early clinical response, 66 (86.8 %) vs. 68 (89.5 %); admission to ICU, 1 (1.3 %) vs. 1 (1.3 %); development of complications, 20 (26.3 %) vs. 22 (28.9 %); readmission, 5 (6.6 %) vs. 6 (7.9 %); in-hospital mortality, 2 (2.6 %) vs. 1 (1.3 %), mortality at 28 day, 3 (3.9 %) vs. 2 (2.6 %), at 90 day, 5 (6.6 %) vs. 4 (5.3 %), at 180 day, 8 (10.5 %) vs. 9 (11.8 %) cases, respectively.

Conclusion: additional measurement of serum CRP in patients with CHF and suspected non-severe CAP was able to reduce rate of systemic ABT administration without outcomes and prognosis worsening.

About the Authors

A. A. Bobylev
Smolensk State Medical University.
Russian Federation
Krupskaya 28, Smolensk 214019.


S. A. Rachina
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia.
Russian Federation
Miklukho‑Maklaya str. 6, Moscow 117198.


S. N. Avdeev
I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University).
Russian Federation
Trubetskaya 8, Bldg. 2, Moscow 119991.


R. S. Kozlov
Research Institute of antimicrobial chemotherapy, Smolensk State Medical University.
Russian Federation
Kirova 46а, Smolensk 214019.


V. V. Mladov
Company Biocad.
Russian Federation
Italian st., 17, St. Petersburg 191186.


References

1. Gau J-T, Acharya U, Khan S, Heh V, Mody L, Kao T-C. Pharmacotherapy and the risk for community-acquired pneumonia. BMC Geriatrics. 2010;10(1). DOI: 10.1186/1471-2318-10-45

2. Bobylev A. A., Rachina S. A., Avdeev S. N., Mladov V. V. Prospects for the use of biomarkers for the diagnosis of community-acquired pneumonia background chronic heart failure. Clinical pharmacology and therapy. 2018;27(3):16–25. [Russian: Бобылев А. А., Рачина С. А., Авдеев С. Н., Младов В. В. Перспективы применения биомаркеров для диагностики внебольничной пневмонии на фоне хронической сердечной недостаточности. Клиническая фармакология и терапия. 2018;27(3):16-25]

3. Wenzel RP. The Antibiotic Pipeline — Challenges, Costs, and Values. New England Journal of Medicine. 2004;351(6):523–6. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp048093

4. Bafadhel M, Clark TW, Reid C, Medina M, Batham S, Barer MR et al. Procalcitonin and C-Reactive Protein in Hospitalized Adult Patients with Community-Acquired Pneumonia or Exacerbation of Asthma or COPD. Chest. 2011;139(6):1410–8. DOI: 10.1378/chest.10-1747

5. Brown JS. Biomarkers and community-acquired pneumonia. Thorax. 2009;64(7):556–8. DOI: 10.1136/thx.2008.110254

6. Müller B, Harbarth S, Stolz D, Bingisser R, Mueller C, Leuppi J et al. Diagnostic and prognostic accuracy of clinical and laboratory parameters in community-acquired pneumonia. BMC Infectious Diseases. 2007;7(1):10. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2334-7-10

7. Kang YA, Kwon S-Y, Yoon HI, Lee JH, Lee C-T. Role of C-Reactive Protein and Procalcitonin in Differentiation of Tuberculosis from Bacterial Community Acquired Pneumonia. The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine. 2009;24(4):337–42. DOI: 10.3904/kjim.2009.24.4.337

8. Lee YJ, Lee J, Park YS, Lee S-M, Yim J-J, Yoo C-G et al. Predictors of Cardiogenic and Non-Cardiogenic Causes in Cases with Bilateral Chest Infiltrates. Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases. 2013;74(1):15–22. DOI: 10.4046/trd.2013.74.1.15

9. Stolz D, Christ-Crain M, Gencay MM, Bingisser R, Huber PR, Müller B et al. Diagnostic value of signs, symptoms and laboratory values in lower respiratory tract infection. Swiss Medical Weekly. 2006;136(27–28):434–40. DOI: 2006/27/smw-11271

10. Steurer J, Held U, Spaar A, Bausch B, Zoller M, Hunziker R et al. A decision aid to rule out pneumonia and reduce unnecessary prescriptions of antibiotics in primary care patients with cough and fever. BMC Medicine. 2011;9(1):56. DOI: 10.1186/1741-7015-9-56

11. Mareev V. Yu., Fomin I. V., Ageev F. T., Begrambekova Yu. L., Vasyuk Yu. A., Garganeeva A. A. et al. Russian Heart Failure Society, Russian Society of Cardiology. Russian Scientific Medical Society of Internal Medicine Guidelines for Heart failure: chronic (CHF) and acute decompensated (ADHF). Diagnosis, prevention and treatment. Kardiologiia. 2018;58(S6):8–164. [Russian: Мареев В. Ю., Фомин И. В., Агеев Ф. Т., Беграмбекова Ю. Л., Васюк Ю. А., Гарганеева А. А. и др. Клинические рекомендации ОССН – РКО – РНМОТ. Сердечная недостаточность: хроническая (ХСН) и острая декомпенсированная (ОДСН). Диагностика, профилактика и лечение. Кардиология. 2018;58(S6):8-164]. DOI: 10.18087/cardio.2475

12. Chuchalin A. G., Sinopalnikov A. I., Kozlov R. S., Tyurin A. E., Rachina S. A. Community-acquired pneumonia in adults: practical recommendations for diagnosis, treatment and prevention (Manual for doctors). Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 2010;12(3):186–225. [Russian: Чучалин А. Г., Синопальников А. И., Козлов Р. С., Тюрин А. Е., Рачина С. А. Внебольничная пневмония у взрослых: практические рекомендации по диагностике, лечению и профилактике (Пособие для врачей). Клиническая микробиология и антимикробная химиотерапия. 2010;12(3):186-225]

13. Kanwar M, Brar N, Khatib R, Fakih MG. Misdiagnosis of Community- Acquired Pneumonia and Inappropriate Utilization of Antibiotics. Chest. 2007;131(6):1865–9. DOI: 10.1378/chest.07-0164

14. Basi SK, Marrie TJ, Huang JQ, Majumdar SR. Patients admitted to hospital with suspected pneumonia and normal chest radiographs: Epidemiology, microbiology, and outcomes. The American Journal of Medicine. 2004;117(5):305–11. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2004.03.029

15. Falk G, Fahey T. C-reactive protein and community-acquired pneumonia in ambulatory care: systematic review of diagnostic accuracy studies. Family Practice. 2008;26(1):10–21. DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmn095

16. Schuetz P, Christ-Crain M, Thomann R, Falconnier C, Wolbers M, Widmer I et al. Effect of Procalcitonin-Based Guidelines vs Standard Guidelines on Antibiotic Use in Lower Respiratory Tract Infections: The ProHOSP Randomized Controlled Trial. JAMA. 2009;302(10):1059–66. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2009.1297

17. Kristoffersen KB, Søgaard OS, Wejse C, Black FT, Greve T, Tarp B et al. Antibiotic treatment interruption of suspected lower respiratory tract infections based on a single procalcitonin measurement at hospital admission—a randomized trial. Clinical Microbiology and Infection. 2009;15(5):481–7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2009.02709.x

18. Castro-Guardiola null, Armengou-Arxé null, Viejo-Rodríguez null, Peñarroja-Matutano null, Garcia-Bragado null. Differential diagnosis between community-acquired pneumonia and non-pneumonia diseases of the chest in the emergency ward. European Journal of Internal Medicine. 2000;11(6):334–9. PMID: 11113658

19. Maisel A, Neath S-X, Landsberg J, Mueller C, Nowak RM, Peacock WF et al. Use of procalcitonin for the diagnosis of pneumonia in patients presenting with a chief complaint of dyspnoea: results from the BACH (Biomarkers in Acute Heart Failure) trial. European Journal of Heart Failure. 2012;14(3):278–86. DOI: 10.1093/eurjhf/hfr177

20. Ruiz-González A, Falguera M, Porcel JM, Martínez-Alonso M, Cabezas P, Geijo P et al. C-reactive protein for discriminating treatment failure from slow responding pneumonia. European Journal of Internal Medicine. 2010;21(6):548–52. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejim.2010.09.006

21. Menendez R, Cavalcanti M, Reyes S, Mensa J, Martinez R, Marcos MA et al. Markers of treatment failure in hospitalised community acquired pneumonia. Thorax. 2008;63(5):447–52. DOI: 10.1136/thx.2007.086785


Review

For citations:


Bobylev A.A., Rachina S.A., Avdeev S.N., Kozlov R.S., Mladov V.V. C-reactive protein evaluation in communityacquired pneumonia with comorbid chronic heart failure as criterion of antibiotic prescription. Kardiologiia. 2019;59(2S):40-46. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18087/cardio.2661

Views: 64007


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0022-9040 (Print)
ISSN 2412-5660 (Online)