Functional Diagnostic Methods in Cardiac Prognosis in Major Abdominal Surgery in Patients with Heart Disease or Over 65 Years Old
https://doi.org/10.18087/cardio.2019.1.10210
Abstract
Purpose of the study. Evaluation of the value of the results of the use of cardiac functional examination methods for the stratification of the risk of developing cardiovascular complications in planned abdominal surgical interventions in patients over 65 years of age or with cardiac pathology.
Materials and methods. The study included 179 patients over 65 years of age or with a history of heart disease who underwent elective abdominal surgery. The median age was 70 years. During the operation and for 30 days after it, cardiac complications were recorded: severe (myocardial infarction, stroke, death from cardiovascular disease), others (strokes of exertional angina, ischemic dynamics of the ST segment on the electrocardiogram – ECG – rest, paroxysmal fibrillation / flutter atrial). All patients underwent basic examination – examination, anamnesis, ECG, blood test, assessment of respiratory function, ECG monitoring. Additionally, echocardiography (EchoCG) and ergospirometry (ESM) were performed.
Results. In 30 (16.8 %) patients, various MTRs were detected: 6 (3.4 %) of fatal myocardial infarctions, 2 (1.1 %) of fatal strokes; 3 (1.7 %) cases of sudden cardiac death, angina attacks were recorded in 4 (2.2 %) patients, 7 (3.9 %) had ischemic ECG dynamics, 11 (6.1 %) had fibrillation episodes or atrial flutter. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, intervention on the colon, blood hemoglobin level <100 g / l, serum creatinine >103 μmol / l, presence of any pathological changes in the resting ECG were associated with the development of SSO; according to EchoCG – VTI (linear velocity integral) in the outflow tract of the left ventricle (LV) <21.5 cm, volume of the left atrium> 57 ml, global LV myocardial deformity is less than 18 %, increase in heart rate (HR) at the 1st minute load test> 27 %, peak oxygen consumption at ESM <15.8 ml / kg / min. The optimal plan for preoperative examination in men is to perform a basic model, and for women it is advisable to combine a basic examination with an ESM or an assessment of the degree of myocardial deformity using the speckle-tracking method for EchoCG.
Conclusion. The risk of perioperative MTS during planned abdominal operations in patients older than 65 years or with a history of heart disease is relatively high – 16.8 %. When assessing the risk associated with the operation, it is advisable to additionally conduct echocardiography with VTI assessment in the LV outflow tract and myocardial deformity indicators, as well as ESM with the determination of HR increase in the 1st minute of the test and peak oxygen consumption.
About the Authors
P. Sh. ChomakhidzeRussian Federation
Chomakhidze Petr Sh. – PhD
Moscow
N. V. Mozzhuhina
Russian Federation
Moscow
M. G. Poltavskaya
Russian Federation
Moscow
V. P. Sedov
Russian Federation
Moscow
A. L. Syrkin
Russian Federation
Moscow
References
1. Guidelines on non-cardiac surgery: cardiovascular assessment and management. ESC / ESA. Eur Heart J 2014;5:2383–2431. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu282
2. Poldermans D., Bax J. J., Boersma E. et al. Guidelines for pre-operative cardiac risk assessment and perioperative cardiac management in non-cardiac surgery: the Task Force for Preoperative Cardiac Risk Assessment and Perioperative Cardiac Management in Noncardiac Surgery of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and European Society of Anaesthesiology (ESA). Eur Heart J 2009;30 (22):2769–2812. DOI: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e328334c017
3. Older P., Smith R., Courtney P., Hone R. Preoperative evaluation of cardiac failure and ischemia in elderly patients by cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Chest 1993;104:701–704. DOI: 10.1378/chest.104.3.701
4. Brunelli R., Refai M., Salati M. et al. Peak oxygen consumption during cardiopulmonary exercise test improves risk stratification in candidates to major lung resection. Chest 2009;135:1260–1267. DOI: 10.1378/chest.08–2059
5. Forshaw M. J., Strauss D. C., Davies A. R. et al. Is cardiopulmonary exercise testing a useful test before oesphagectomy. Annals of Thoracic Surgery 2008;85:294–309. DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.05.062
6. You-sheng M., Jie H. E. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing in the evaluation of high risk patients with lung cancer. Chinese Medical J 2010;123 (21):3089–3094. DOI: 10.1186/1939-4551-8-S1-A22
7. Rohde L. E., Polanczyk C. A., Goldman L. et al. Usefulness of transthoracic echocardiography as a tool for risk stratification of patients undergoing major noncardiac surgery. Am J Cardiol 2001;87 (5):505–514. PubMed: 11230829
8. Landesberg G., Mosseri M., PRO: Preoperative Coronary Revascularization in High-Risk Patients Undergoing Vascular Surgery. Anesth Analg 2008;106:759–763. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehl523
9. Biteker M., Duman D., Tekkesin A. I. Predictive value of preoperative electrocardiography for perioperative cardiovascular outcomes in patients undergoing noncardiac, nonvascular surgery. Clin Cardiol 2012;35:494–499. DOI: 10.1002/clc.21003
10. Prentis J. M., Manas D. M. D. Submaximal Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing Predicts 90-Day Survival After Liver Transplantation. Liver transplantation 2012;18:152–159. DOI: 10.1002/lt.22426
11. Nagamatsu Y., Shima I., Yamana H. et al. Preoperative evaluation of cardiopulmonary reserve with the use of expired gas analysis during exercise testing in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2001;121:1064–1072. DOI: 10.1067/mtc.2001.113596
12. Syrkin A. L., Aksel’rod A. S., Novikova N. A. et al. Rukovodstvo po funkcional’noj diagnostike (nauchno-prakticheskoe posobie). M: Zolotoj standart. 2009; 442 s. Russian (Сыркин А. Л., Аксельрод А. С., Новикова Н. А. и др. Руководство по функциональной диагностике (научно-практическое пособие). М: Золотой стандарт, 2009; 442 с.)
13. Steen Dalby Kristensen, Juhani Knuuti, Antii Saraste еt al. Guidelines on non-cardiac surgery: cardiovascular assessment and management. ESC / ESA. European Heart Journal 2014;35:2383– 2431. DOI: 10.12968/hmed.2017.78.6.327
14. Cho D. H., Park S. M., Kim M. N. et al. Presence of preoperative diastolic dysfunction predicts postoperative pulmonary edema and cardiovascular complications in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. Echocardiography 2014;31 (1):42–51. DOI: 10.1111/echo.12285
15. Prognozirovanie i profilaktika kardial’nyh oslozhnenij vneserdechnyh hirurgicheskih vmeshatel’stv. Nacional’nye rekomendacii. Kardiovaskuljarnaja terapija i profilaktika 2011;6: prilozhenie 3. Russian (Прогнозирование и профилактика кардиаль-ных осложнений внесердечных хирургических вмешательств. Национальные рекомендации. Кардиоваскулярная терапия и профилактика 2011;6: приложение 3.)
16. Chapman C. B., Ewer S. M., Kelly A. F. et al. Classification of Left Ventricular Diastolic Function Using American Society of Echocardio graphy Guidelines: Agreement among Echocardio graphers. Echocardiography 2013;30 (9):1022–1031. DOI: 10.1111/echo.12185
17. Lang R. M., Badano L. P., Mor-Avi V. et al. Recommendations for Cardiac Chamber Quantification by Echocardiography in Adults: An Update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2015;28 (1):183–193. DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2014.10.003
18. Voigt J. U., Pedrizzetti G., Lysyansky P. et al. Definitions for a Common Standard for 2D SpeckleTracking Echocardiography. Consensus document of the EACVI / ASE / Industry Task Force to Standardize Deformation Imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2014;17:12–27. DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jeu184
19. Yingchoncharoen T., Agarwal S., Popović Z. B., Marwick T. H. Normal ranges of left ventricular strain: a meta-analysis. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2013;26 (2):185–191. DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2012.10.008
Review
For citations:
Chomakhidze P.Sh., Mozzhuhina N.V., Poltavskaya M.G., Sedov V.P., Syrkin A.L. Functional Diagnostic Methods in Cardiac Prognosis in Major Abdominal Surgery in Patients with Heart Disease or Over 65 Years Old. Kardiologiia. 2019;59(1):69-78. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18087/cardio.2019.1.10210