Characteristics of Atherosclerotic Plaques Left after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome. Assessment According to Computed Tomographic Angiography of the Coronary Arteries

Aim. To evaluate characteristics of atherosclerotic plaques (ASP) remaining after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) by coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA).
Material and methods. Among 249 patients (193 men) with ACS aged 58±10 years, 183 (73.5%) had myocardial infarction, 66 (26.5%) had unstable angina. CCTA was performed after PCI at 3-7 days after the onset of ACS according to the standard protocol: in 41 patients, on a 64-slice tomograph (Aquilion 64, Toshiba, Japan) and in 208 patients, on a 640-slice tomograph with 320 rows of detectors (Aquilion ONE Vision Edition, Toshiba, Japan). CCTA of all patients was performed on a Vitrea workstation. Patients with at least one non-calcified ASP were included.
Results. Among all ASPs, non-calcified ASPs predominated, 609 of 785 (77.6%), including 400 soft and 209 combined ones. Signs of obstruction (stenosis ≥50%) were noted in 72.2% of non-calcified ASPs. ASPs were characterized by a pronounced burden, 69 [61.4; 74.2]%, and a low minimum density, 31 [23; 37] HU, which was consistent with mature plaques with a lipid core. Various signs of ASP instability were observed in 6-35.3% of cases. There were 2 [2;3] (1 to 6) affected coronary arteries (CAs) and 3 [2;4] (1 to 7) ASPs, including calcified ones, per patient. 77.7% of ASPs were located in the CA proximal and middle segments. Obstructive stenosis was detected in 92% of patients. The number of ASPs with obstructive stenosis ranged from 0 to 7 per patient, with a median of 2 [1;3]. In 44% of patients, stenosis was 70% or more. The maximum burden of non-calcified ASPs was high, 74.3±12.1%; their maximum and total length were 13.8±10.4 mm and 26.5±19.7 mm, respectively; and the ASP minimum density was low, 25 [17;32] HU. ASPs with a low-density area of ≤46 HU and ≤30 HU were detected in 24.9% and 14.8% of patients, respectively. Other CCTA signs of instability were quite common: punctate calcifications in 52.2% of patients, coronary positive remodeling in 37%, the presence of “ring-like enhancement” in 16.1%, an uneven plaque contour in 26.7%, and at least one sign of ASP instability in 73% of patients.
Conclusion. After PCI, patients with ACS still have rather many ASPs, including those with CCTA signs of instability, with stenosis >50%; more than a third of the plaques had stenosis >70%; the plaques were extended and localized mainly in the proximal and middle sections of the main CAs.

1. Virmani R, Burke AP, Farb A, Kolodgie FD. Pathology of the Vulnerable Plaque. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2006;47(8):C13–8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.10.065

2. Stone GW, Maehara A, Lansky AJ, de Bruyne B, Cristea E, Mintz GS et al. A Prospective Natural-History Study of Coronary Atherosclerosis. New England Journal of Medicine. 2011;364(3):226–35. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1002358

3. Prati F, Romagnoli E, Gatto L, La Manna A, Burzotta F, Ozaki Y et al. Relationship between coronary plaque morphology of the left anterior descending artery and 12 months clinical outcome: the CLIMA study. European Heart Journal. 2020;41(3):383–91. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz520

4. Kubo T, Ino Y, Mintz GS, Shiono Y, Shimamura K, Takahata M et al. Optical coherence tomography detection of vulnerable plaques at high risk of developing acute coronary syndrome. European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging. 2021;jeab028. [Epub ahead of print]. DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jeab028

5. El Manaa H.E., Shchekochikhin D.Yu., Shabanova M.S., Lomonosova A.A., Gognieva D.G., Ternovoy S.K. et al. Multislice Computed Tomography Capabilities in Assessment of the Coronary Arteries Atherosclerotic Lesions. Kardiologiia. 2019;59(2):24–31. DOI: 10.18087/cardio.2019.2.10214

6. Shaw LJ, Blankstein R, Bax JJ, Ferencik M, Bittencourt MS, Min JK et al. Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography / North American Society of Cardiovascular Imaging – Expert Consensus Document on Coronary CT Imaging of Atherosclerotic Plaque. Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. 2021;15(2):93–109. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcct.2020.11.002

7. Chen Q, Pan T, Wang YN, Schoepf UJ, Bidwell SL, Qiao H et al. A Coronary CT Angiography Radiomics Model to Identify Vulnerable Plaque and Predict Cardiovascular Events. Radiology. 2023;307(2):e221693. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.221693

8. Dudum R, Dzaye O, Mirbolouk M, Dardari ZA, Orimoloye OA, Budoff MJ et al. Coronary artery calcium scoring in low risk patients with family history of coronary heart disease: Validation of the SCCT guideline approach in the coronary artery calcium consortium. Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. 2019;13(3):21–5. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcct.2019.03.012

9. Lin A, Manral N, McElhinney P, Killekar A, Matsumoto H, Kwiecinski J et al. Deep learning-enabled coronary CT angiography for plaque and stenosis quantification and cardiac risk prediction: an international multicentre study. The Lancet Digital Health. 2022;4(4):e256– 65. DOI: 10.1016/S2589-7500(22)00022-X

10. Williams MC, Kwiecinski J, Doris M, McElhinney P, D’Souza MS, Cadet S et al. Low-Attenuation Noncalcified Plaque on Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Predicts Myocardial Infarction: Results From the Multicenter SCOT-HEART Trial (Scottish Computed Tomography of the HEART). Circulation. 2020;141(18):1452–62. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.044720

11. Thomsen C, Abdulla J. Characteristics of high-risk coronary plaques identified by computed tomographic angiography and associated prognosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. European Heart Journal – Cardiovascular Imaging. 2016;17(2):120–9. DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jev325

12. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, Chaitman BR, Bax JJ, Morrow DA et al. Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (2018). Circulation. 2018;138(20):e618–51. DOI: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000617

13. Byrne RA, Rossello X, Coughlan JJ, Barbato E, Berry C, Chieffo A et al. 2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes. European Heart Journal. 2023;44(38):3720–826. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad191

14. Merkulova I.N., Shariya M.A., Mironov V.M., Shabanova M.S., Veselova T.N., Gaman S.A. et al. Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography Possibilities in “High Risk” Plaque Identification in Patients with non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome: Comparison with Intravascular Ultrasound. Kardiologiia. 2021;60(12):64–75. DOI: 10.18087/cardio.2020.12.n1304

15. Barysheva N.A., Merkulova I.N., Shariya M.A., Shabanova M.S., Veselova T.N., Gaman S.A. et al. Assessment of atherosclerotic plaques morphology and composition by computed tomography coronary angiography: comparison in patients with acute coronary syndrome and stable angina. Russian Cardiology Bulletin. 2020;15(4):48–56. DOI: 10.36396/MS.2020.15.4.007

16. Iannaccone M, Quadri G, Taha S, D’Ascenzo F, Montefusco A, Omede’ P et al. Prevalence and predictors of culprit plaque rupture at OCT in patients with coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis. European Heart Journal – Cardiovascular Imaging. 2016;17(10):1128–37. DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jev283

17. Kubo T, Maehara A, Mintz GS, Doi H, Tsujita K, Choi S-Y et al. The Dynamic Nature of Coronary Artery Lesion Morphology Assessed by Serial Virtual Histology Intravascular Ultrasound Tissue Characterization. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2010;55(15):1590–7. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.07.078