ВАЖНО! Правила приравнивания журналов, входящих в международные базы данных к журналам перечня ВАК.
Ответ на официальный запрос в ВАК журнала Кардиология.

Preview

Structural and Functional Disturbances of the Thoracic Aorta in Atherosclerosis of Various Gradations

https://doi.org/10.18087/cardio.2023.11.n2315

Abstract

Aim      To study global aortic circumferential strain in normal conditions and in atherosclerosis of various grades and to determine its role in prediction of structural and functional disorders of the thoracic aorta (TA) and coronary atherosclerosis using 2D speckle-tracking transesophageal echocardiography.

Material and methods  182 patients with typical or probable angina were examined. The control group consisted of 11 healthy volunteers. TA was visualized along its entire length. The height of each atheroma was measured, and the total number of plaques in the TA was determined. Five stages of TA atherosclerosis were identified. In the descending TA, the global peak systolic circumferential strain (GCS, %) and the global peak systolic circumferential strain normalized to pulse arterial pressure (PAP) (GCS / PAP∙100) were calculated. All patients underwent coronary angiography. The number of coronary arteries (CAs) with >50 % stenosis was determined, and the SYNTAX Score was calculated.

Results TA atherosclerosis was not detected in the control group. Among 182 patients, stage 1-5 TA atherosclerosis was found in 23 (12.6 %), 103 (56.6 %), 43 (23.6 %), 7 (3.8 %), and 6 (3.4 %) cases respectively. GCS and GCS / PAD decreased as the ultrasound stage of TA atherosclerosis increased as compared with the control group: 9.2 % and 15.3 for the control group; stage 1, 5.6 % and 8.9 (p<0.001); stage 2, 4.1 % and 5.9 (p<0.001); stage 3, 4 % and 5.8 (p<0.001); stage 4, 3.7 % and 4.9 (p<0.01); and stage 5, 2.6 % and 3.3 (p<0.01), respectively. ROC analysis showed that GCS ≥5.9 % (area under the curve, AUC, 0.94±0.03; p<0.001) and GCS / PAD ≥11.4 (AUC, 0.97±0.02; p <0.001) were predictors of intact TA. Also, GCS ≤4.85 % (AUC, 0.82±0.04; p<0.001) and GCS / PAD ≤8.06 (AUC, 0.87±0.03; p<0.001) were predictors of hemodynamically significant TA atherosclerosis (stages 3-5). GCS ≤4.05 % (AUC, 0.62±0.04; p=0.007) and GCS / PAD ≤5.95 (AUC, 0.61±0.04; p=0.018) were predictors of hemodynamically significant (>50 %) stenosing atherosclerosis of at least one CA. Furthermore, GCS ≤3.75 % (AUC, 0.67±0.07; p=0.039) and GCS / PAD ≤5.15 (AUC, 0.64±0.07; p=0.045) were predictors of severe and advanced coronary atherosclerosis (SYNTAX Score ≥22).

Conclusion      GCS and GCS / PAD are new diagnostic markers of structural and functional disorders of TA in atherosclerosis of various grades. GCS and GCS / PAD are independent predictors of high-grade TA atherosclerosis (stages 3-5) with GCS / PAD demonstrating the highest level of significance. GCS and GCS / PAD are non-invasive predictors of severe and advanced CA atherosclerosis.

About the Authors

A. V. Vrublevsky
Research Institute of Cardiology, Tomsk National Research Medical Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Tomsk
Russian Federation

Doctor of Medical Sciences, Senior Researcher



A. A. Boshchenko
Research Institute of Cardiology, Tomsk National Research Medical Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Tomsk
Russian Federation

Doctor of Medical Sciences, Deputy Director of Science, Senior Researcher



Yu. I. Bogdanov
Research Institute of Cardiology, Tomsk National Research Medical Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Tomsk
Russian Federation

Candidate of Medical Sciences, Doctor of X-ray Endovascular Diagnostics and Treatment



V. V. Saushkin
Research Institute of Cardiology, Tomsk National Research Medical Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Tomsk
Russian Federation

Candidate of Medical Sciences, Senior Researcher



O. L. Shnaider
Research Institute of Cardiology, Tomsk National Research Medical Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Tomsk
Russian Federation

junior researcher



References

1. Mitchell GF. Arterial Stiffness in Aging: Does It Have a Place in Clinical Practice?: Recent Advances in Hypertension. Hypertension. 2021;77(3):768–80. DOI: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.14515

2. Bu Z, Ma J, Fan Y, Qiao Z, Kang Y, Zheng Y et al. Ascending Aortic Strain Analysis Using 2-Dimensional Speckle Tracking Echocardiography Improves the Diagnostics for Coronary Artery Stenosis in Patients With Suspected Stable Angina Pectoris. Journal of the American Heart Association. 2018;7(14):e008802. DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.118.008802

3. Wehrum T, Günther F, Kams M, Wendel S, Strecker C, Mirzaee H et al. Quantification of aortic stiffness in stroke patients using 4D flow MRI in comparison with transesophageal echocardiography. The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging. 2018;34(10):1629–36. DOI: 10.1007/s10554-018-1369-2

4. Rong LQ, Kim J, Gregory AJ. Speckle tracking echocardiography: imaging insights into the aorta. Current Opinion in Cardiology. 2020;35(2):116–22. DOI: 10.1097/HCO.0000000000000706

5. Vrublevsky A.V., Boshchenko A.A., Karpov R.S. Complex ultrasound assessment of atherosclerosis of thoracic aorta and coronary arteries. -Tomsk: STT;2007. - 180 p. ISBN 5-93629-268-1

6. Catapano F, Pambianchi G, Cundari G, Rebelo J, Cilia F, Carbone I et al. 4D flow imaging of the thoracic aorta: is there an added clinical value? Cardiovascular Diagnosis and Therapy. 2020;10(4):1068–89. DOI: 10.21037/cdt-20-452

7. Alreshidan M, Shahmansouri N, Chung J, Lash V, Emmott A, Leask RL et al. Obtaining the biomechanical behavior of ascending aortic aneurysm via the use of novel speckle tracking echocardiography. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2017;153(4):781–8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.11.056

8. Iino H, Okano T, Daimon M, Sasaki K, Chigira M, Nakao T et al. Usefulness of Carotid Arterial Strain Values for Evaluating the Arteriosclerosis. Journal of Atherosclerosis and Thrombosis. 2019;26(5):476–87. DOI: 10.5551/jat.45591

9. Cameli M, Mandoli GE, Sciaccaluga C, Mondillo S. More than 10 years of speckle tracking echocardiography: Still a novel technique or a definite tool for clinical practice? Echocardiography. 2019;36(5):958–70. DOI: 10.1111/echo.14339

10. Petrini J, Eriksson MJ, Caidahl K, Larsson M. Circumferential strain by velocity vector imaging and speckle-tracking echocardiography: validation against sonomicrometry in an aortic phantom. Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging. 2018;38(2):269–77. DOI: 10.1111/cpf.12410

11. Vrublevsky A.V., Boshchenko A.A., Bogdanov Yu.I. Possibilities and limitations of three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography in the diagnosis of thoracic aorta atherosclerosis. Kardiologiia. 2019;59(10S):22–30. DOI: 10.18087/cardio.n692

12. Goldstein SA, Evangelista A, Abbara S, Arai A, Asch FM, Badano LP et al. Multimodality Imaging of Diseases of the Thoracic Aorta in Adults: From the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography. 2015;28(2):119–82. DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2014.11.015

13. Oishi Y, Mizuguchi Y, Miyoshi H, Iuchi A, Nagase N, Oki T. A Novel Approach to Assess Aortic Stiffness Related to Changes in Aging Using a Two-Dimensional Strain Imaging. Echocardiography. 2008;25(9):941–5. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8175.2008.00725.x

14. Hirai T, Sasayama S, Kawasaki T, Yagi S. Stiffness of systemic arteries in patients with myocardial infarction. A noninvasive method to predict severity of coronary atherosclerosis. Circulation. 1989;80(1):78–86. DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.80.1.78

15. Sianos G, Morel M-A, Kappetein AP, Morice M-C, Colombo A, Dawkins K et al. The SYNTAX Score: an angiographic tool grading the complexity of coronary artery disease. EuroIntervention. 2005;1(2):219–27. PMID: 19758907

16. Caro C, Pedley T, Schroter R, Seed W. The mechanics of the circulation. -M.: Mir;1981. - 624 p.


Review

For citations:


Vrublevsky A.V., Boshchenko A.A., Bogdanov Yu.I., Saushkin V.V., Shnaider O.L. Structural and Functional Disturbances of the Thoracic Aorta in Atherosclerosis of Various Gradations. Kardiologiia. 2023;63(11):64-72. https://doi.org/10.18087/cardio.2023.11.n2315

Views: 587


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0022-9040 (Print)
ISSN 2412-5660 (Online)