Comparison of Various Regimens of Antithrombotic Therapy in Patients With Valvular Heart Disease and Coronary Artery Disease After Surgical and Interventional Interventions
https://doi.org/10.18087/cardio.2023.7.n2132
Abstract
Aim. To evaluate the postoperative incidence of bleeding, incidence of thromboembolic complications, and all-cause mortality in patients with valvular heart disease and ischemic heart disease (IHD) associated with various regimens of the antithrombotic treatment during one year after surgery.
Material and methods. This study included 271 patients with valvular heart disease and IHD after heart valve replacement and myocardial revascularization from 2009 through 2018. However, during the follow-up period (12 months), contact with 12 patients was lost, and therefore these patients were excluded from the study. Further analysis included 259 patients. Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in combination with heart valve intervention was performed in 217 (83.8 %) patients, and percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) were performed in 42 (16.2 %) patients. There were 197 (72.7 %) male participants; median age was 64.0 [58.0; 67.5] years. The patients were divided into two groups. Group 1 consisted of 113 patients who received postoperative dual antithrombotic therapy (DAT) with acetylsalicylic acid (ASA)/clopidogrel+vitamin K antagonist (VKA). Group 2 included 146 patients receiving postoperative triple antithrombotic therapy (TAT) with ASA+clopidogrel+VKA. Follow-up duration was 12 months after surgery. Due to significant intergroup differences in major clinical anamnestic data, the data were adjusted using pseudo-randomization (Propensity Score Matching, PSM). In result, 109 patients were selected for each group.
Results. The incidence of adverse hemorrhagic outcomes was significantly higher in the group treated with TAT than with DAT. Minor bleedings were observed in 19 (17.4 %) vs. 8 (7.3 %) cases; moderate, clinically significant bleedings in 16 (14.7 %) vs. 6 (5.5 %) cases; and the total number of bleedings was 35 (32.1 %) vs. 14 (12.8 %; p=0.02, p=0.02, and р=0.001, respectively). Comparing the incidence of major bleedings did not show and significant intergroup differences (p=1.000). The incidence rate of any bleeding during the follow-up period was 32.1 % in patients treated with TAT (n=109) and 12.8 % in patients treated with DAT (n=109; p=0.005). The incidence of no bleeding during one year after surgery was 87 % in the DAT treatment group and 67 % in the TAT treatment group (p=0.005). The incidence of secondary endpoints, including ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, prosthetic valve thrombosis, and death, was statistically non-significant.
Conclusion. Administration of DAT vs. TAT after heart valve replacement and myocardial revascularization significantly decreases the incidence of any bleedings in the absence of significant differences in the incidence of thromboembolic events and mortality.
Keywords
About the Authors
E. V. RuzinaRussian Federation
cardiologist,
Moscow
B. Sh. Berdibekov
Russian Federation
cardiologist,
Moscow
N. I. Bulaeva
Russian Federation
PhD, Сardiologist, Chief of Scientific Department,
Moscow
M. Ch. Kubova
Russian Federation
researcher, cardiologist,
Moscow
E. Z. Golukhova
Russian Federation
PhD, Professor, academic Russian Academy of Science, Director of A.N. Bakulev NMRCVS,
Moscow
References
1. Nutescu E, Bathija S, Sharp L, Gerber BS, Schumock GT, Fitzgibbon ML. Anticoagulation patient self-monitoring in the United States: considerations for clinical practice adoption. Pharmacotherapy. 2011; 31(12):1161-1174. DOI: 10.1592/phco.31.12.1161.
2. Baumgartner H, Falk V, Bax JJ, De Bonis M, Hamm C, Holm PJ et al. ESC Scientific Document Group. 2017 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. EurHeart J. 2017 Sep 21; 38(36):2739-2791. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx391.
3. Lip GY, Huber K, Andreotti F, Arnesen H, Airaksinen KJ, Cuisset T et al. Management of antithrombotic therapy in atrial fibrillation patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome and/or undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention stenting. ThrombHaemost. 2010; 103: 13–28. DOI: 10.1160/TH09-08-0580.
4. Hansen ML, Sorensen R, Mette, Clausen MT, Marie P, Fog-Petersen L et al. Risk of bleeding with single, dual, or triple therapy with warfarin, aspirin, and clopidogrel in patients with atrial fibrillation. Arch Intern Med. 2010; 170: 1433–41. DOI: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.271.
5. Valgimigli M, Bueno H, Byrne RA, Collet JP, Costa F, Jeppsson A et al. ESC Scientific Document Group; ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines (CPG); ESC National Cardiac Societies. 2017 ESC focused update on dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease developed in collaboration with EACTS: The Task Force for dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). EurHeart J. 2018 Jan 14;39(3):213-260. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx419.
6. Oldgren J, Budaj A, Granger CB, Khder Y, Roberts J, Siegbahn A et al. Dabigatran vs. placebo in patients with acute coronary syndromes on dual antiplatelet therapy: a randomized, double-blind, phase II trial. Eur Heart J. 2011; 32:2781–2789. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr051.
7. Lopes RD, Al-Khatib SM, Wallentin L, Yang H, Ansell J, Bahit MC et al. Efficacy and safety of apixaban compared with warfarin according to patient risk of stroke and of bleeding in atrial fibrillation: a secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2012; 380:1749–1758. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60986-6.
8. Barnes GD, Gu X, Haymart B, Kline-Rogers E, Almany S, Kozlowski J et al. The predictive ability of the CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc scores for bleeding risk in atrial fibrillation: the MAQ (2) experience. Thromb Res 2014; 134:294–299. DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2014.05.034.
9. Roldan V, Marin F, Manzano-Fernandez S, Gallego P, Vilchez JA, Valdes M et al. The HAS-BLED score has better prediction accuracy for major bleeding than CHADS2 or CHA2DS2-VASc scores in anticoagulated patients with atrial fibrillation. J Am CollCardiol 2013; 62:2199–2204. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.08.1623.
10. Dewilde WJM, Oirbans T, Verheugt FWA, Kelder JC, De Smet BJ, Herrman JP et al. Use of clopidogrel with or without aspirin in patients taking oral anticoagulant therapy and undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: An open-label, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet 2013; 381:1107–1115. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)62177-1.
11. Gibson CM, Mehran R, Bode C, Halperin J, Verheugt FW, Wildgoose P et al. Prevention of bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing PCI. N. Engl. J. Med. 2016; 375: 2423–2434. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1611594.
12. Cannon CP, Bhatt DL, Oldgren J, Lip GYH, Ellis SG, Kimura T et al. Dual antithrombotic therapy with dabigatran after PCI in atrial fibrillation. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017; 377: 1513–1524. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1708454.
13. Connolly SJ, Ezekowitz MD, Yusuf S, Eikelboom J, Oldgren J, Parekh A et al. Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2009; 361: 1139-51. DOI: 10.1517/14656560903530691.
14. Lopes RD, Heizer G, Aronson R, Vora AN, Massaro T, Mehran R et al. Antithrombotic Therapy after Acute Coronary Syndrome or PCI in Atrial Fibrillation. New England Journal of Medicine 2019; 380(16):509-1524. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1817083.
Review
For citations:
Ruzina E.V., Berdibekov B.Sh., Bulaeva N.I., Kubova M.Ch., Golukhova E.Z. Comparison of Various Regimens of Antithrombotic Therapy in Patients With Valvular Heart Disease and Coronary Artery Disease After Surgical and Interventional Interventions. Kardiologiia. 2023;63(7):47-53. https://doi.org/10.18087/cardio.2023.7.n2132