Factors associated with an increase in spatial and frontal QRS-T angles in patients with anterior myocardial infarction

Aim    To determine existence of a relationship between any clinical, echocardiographic and coronarographic factors and increased spatial QRS-T (sQRS-T) angle and frontal QRS-T (fQRS-T) angle in patients with anterior myocardial infarction.
Material and methods    This study included 137 patients aged 62 [53; 72] years with anterior acute myocardial infarction managed at the A.L. Myasnikov Institute of Clinical Cardiology. fQRS-T was calculated as the module of difference between the frontal plane QRS complex axis and the T wave axis. sQRS-T was calculated as a spatial angle between QRS and T integral vectors from a synthesized vectorcardiogram.
Results    fQRS-T values for a group (median [25th; 75th percentile]) were 81 [37; 120]°; sQRS-T values were 114 [80; 141]°. The correlation coefficient between fQRS-T and sQRS-T values was 0.41 (p<0.001). fQRS-T weakly but statistically significantly correlated with patients’ age (r=0.28; p=0.001), left ventricular ejection fraction (LV EF, r= –0.22; p=0.01), and glomerular filtration rate (r=–0.32; p=0.0002). sQRS-T weakly but statistically significantly correlated with left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (r=0.24; p=0.0048), LV EF (r=–0.28; p=0.0009), and the number of affected segments according to echocardiography data (r=0.27; p=0.002). fQRS-T values were significantly higher in the presence of concurrent arterial hypertension. sQRS-T values were significantly higher in the presence of a history of chronic heart failure. Both fQRS-T and sQRS-T values increased with increasing number of affected blood vessels and Killip class of acute heart failure.
Conclusion    In patients after anterior acute myocardial infarction, increases in fQRS-T and sQRS-T are associated with more severe damage of the vasculature, decreased LV EF, and, thus, more severe clinical course of disease.

1. Blinova E.V., Sakhnova T.A., Yurasova E.S. Diagnostic and prognostic significance of QRS-T angle. Therapeutic Archive. 2020;92(9):85–93. DOI: 10.26442/00403660.2020.09.000752

2. Colluoglu T, Tanriverdi Z, Unal B, Ozcan EE, Dursun H, Kaya D. The role of baseline and post‐procedural frontal plane QRS‐T angles for cardiac risk assessment in patients with acute STEMI. Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology. 2018;23(5):e12558. DOI: 10.1111/anec.12558

3. Lown MT, Munyombwe T, Harrison W, West RM, Hall CA, Morrell C et al. Association of Frontal QRS-T Angle–Age Risk Score on Admission Electrocardiogram with Mortality in Patients Admitted With an Acute Coronary Syndrome. The American Journal of Cardiology. 2012;109(3):307–13. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.09.014

4. Sawant AC, Bhardwaj A, Srivatsa S, Sridhara S, Prakash MPH, Kanwar N et al. Prognostic value of frontal QRS-T angle in predicting survival after primary percutaneous coronary revascularization/coronary artery bypass grafting for ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Indian Heart Journal. 2019;71(6):481–7. DOI: 10.1016/j.ihj.2019.09.008

5. Strebel I, Twerenbold R, Wussler D, Boeddinghaus J, Nestelberger T, du Fay de Lavallaz J et al. Incremental diagnostic and prognostic value of the QRS-T angle, a 12-lead ECG marker quantifying heterogeneity of depolarization and repolarization, in patients with suspected nonST-elevation myocardial infarction. International Journal of Cardiology. 2019;277:8–15. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.09.040

6. Raposeiras-Roubín S, Virgós-Lamela A, Bouzas-Cruz N, López-López A, Castiñeira-Busto M, Fernández-Garda R et al. Usefulness of the QRS-T Angle to Improve Long-Term Risk Stratification of Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction and Depressed Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction. The American Journal of Cardiology. 2014;113(8):1312–9. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.01.406

7. Kurisu S, Nitta K, Sumimoto Y, Ikenaga H, Ishibashi K, Fukuda Y et al. Myocardial perfusion defect assessed by single-photon emission computed tomography and frontal QRS-T angle in patients with prior anterior myocardial infarction. Heart and Vessels. 2019;34(6):971–5. DOI: 10.1007/s00380-018-01330-9

8. Kurisu S, Nitta K, Sumimoto Y, Ikenaga H, Ishibashi K, Fukuda Y et al. Effects of Myocardial Perfusion Defect on the Frontal QRS-T Angle in Anterior Versus Inferior Myocardial Infarction. Internal Medicine. 2020;59(1):23–8. DOI: 10.2169/internalmedicine.3348-19

9. Li Y-H, Ren X-J, Han Z-H, Wang Y-L, Wang Y, Zhang J-R et al. Value of the frontal planar QRS-T angle on cardiac dysfunction in patients with old myocardial infarction. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine. 2013;6(8):688–92. PMID: 24040478

10. Zadeh B, Wambach JM, Lambers M, Nassenstein K, Jensen CJ, Bruder O. QRS-T-angle in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) - a Comparison with Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging. International Journal of Medical Sciences. 2020;17(15):2264–8. DOI: 10.7150/ijms.44312

11. Dogan A, Kahraman S. Frontal QRS-T angle predicts coronary atherosclerotic burden in patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction. Journal of Electrocardiology. 2020; 58:155–9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2019.11.042

12. Erdogan G, Yontar OC, Yenercag M, Gul S, Arslan U. Frontal QRS-T angle predicts syntax score in patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction. Journal of Electrocardiology. 2020; 61:86–91. DOI: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2020.06.008

13. Sakhnova T.A., Blinova E.V., Merkulova I.N., Shakhnovich R.M., Zhukova N.S., Sukhinina T.S. et al. Factors Associated with the Increase in Spatial and Frontal QRS-T Angles in Patients with Inferior Myocardial Infarction. Kardiologiia. 2020;60(11):76–83. DOI: 10.18087/cardio.2020.11.n1295

14. Smirnov A.V., Shilov E.M., Dobronravov V.A., Kayukov I.G., Bobkova I.N., Shvetsov M.Yu. et al. National recommendations. Chronic kidney disease: basic principles of screening, diagnosis, prevention and treatment approaches. Nephrology. 2012;16(1):89–115.

15. Boytsov S.A., Drapkina O.M. Modern content and improvement of high cardiovascular risk strategy in reducing mortality from cardiovascular diseases. Therapeutic Archive. 2021;93(1):4–6. DOI: 10.26442/00403660.2021.01.200543

16. Averkov O.V., Duplyakov D.V., Gilyarov M.Yu., Novikova N.A., Shakhnovich R.M., Yakovlev A.N. et al. 2020 Clinical practice guidelines for Acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2020;25(11):251–310. DOI: 10.15829/29/1560-4071-2020-4103

17. Selvaraj S, Ilkhanoff L, Burke MA, Freed BH, Lang RM, Martinez EE et al. Association of the Frontal QRS-T Angle with Adverse Cardiac Remodeling, Impaired Left and Right Ventricular Function, and Worse Outcomes in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography. 2014;27(1):74-82.e2. DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2013.08.023

18. Sweda R, Sabti Z, Strebel I, Kozhuharov N, Wussler D, Shrestha S et al. Diagnostic and prognostic values of the QRS‐T angle in patients with suspected acute decompensated heart failure. ESC Heart Failure. 2020;7(4):1817–29. DOI: 10.1002/ehf2.12746

19. Kurisu S, Nitta K, Watanabe N, Ikenaga H, Ishibashi K, Fukuda Y et al. Associations of frontal QRS-T angle with left ventricular volume and function derived from ECG-gated SPECT in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease. Annals of Nuclear Medicine. 2021;35(6):662–8. DOI: 10.1007/s12149-021-01596-6

20. Jaroszyński A, Furmaga J, Zapolski T, Zaborowski T, Rudzki S, Dąbrowski W. The improvement of QRS-T angle as a manifestation of reverse electrical remodeling following renal transplantation in endstage kidney disease patients on haemodialysis. BMC Nephrology. 2019;20(1):441. DOI: 10.1186/s12882-019-1624-3

21. Zhang Z, Rautaharju PM, Prineas RJ, Tereshchenko L, Soliman EZ. Electrocardiographic QRS-T angle and the risk of incident silent myocardial infarction in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study. Journal of Electrocardiology. 2017;50(5):661–6. DOI: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2017.05.001