The value of the spatial QRS–T angle for assessing the severity of heart damage in patients with arterial hypertension

Aim      To study the relationship between clinical, echocardiographic, and laboratory indexes with increased QRS–T spatial angle (sQRS–T) in patients with arterial hypertension (AH).

Material and methods  The study included 160 patients with AH, 61 (38 %) men and 99 (62 %) women aged 58 [49; 67] years. Patients with ischemic heart disease or His bundle blocks were not included. Echocardiography was used to determine the left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (LV EDD), left ventricular posterior wall thickness (LVPWT), interventricular septal thickness (IVST), relative wall thickness (RWT), left ventricular myocardial mass (LVMM), and LVMM index (LVMMI). Also, the following indexes were analyzed: office systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP, DBP), disease duration, body mass index, plasma levels of glucose, cholesterol, and creatinine, and glomerular filtration rate. The QRS-T spatial angle was calculated as an angle between the integral vectors QRS and T using a vectorcardiogram derived from a 12-lead digital electrocardiogram. Data are presented as median (25^th percentile; 75^th percentile].

Results The QRS-T spatial angle for the group was 65 [43; 90]°. The QRS–T spatial angle increased with increases in the AH grade (grade 1 AH, 55 [37; 74]°; grade 2 AH, 60 [41; 82]°; grade 3 AH, 88 [62; 107]°; р<0.0001); the AH stage (stage 1, 50 [41; 77]°; stage 2, 68 [44; 93]°; stage 3, 78 [59; 110]°; р=0.0002), and the cardiovascular risk degree (low and moderate risk, 49 [37; 70]°, high risk, 62 [43; 88]° (р=0.005); very high risk, 88 [61; 117]° vs. high risk, 62 [43; 88]° (р=0.0002). The QRS–T spatial angle was greater with diabetes mellitus (78 [60; 117]°) than without it (63 [43; 89]°) (р=0.03). Weak but significant correlations were found between sQRS–T and body mass index (r=0.2; p<0.01), SBP (r=0.4; p<0.0001), DBP (r=0.2; p<0.01), LV EDD (r=0.2; p<0.01), LV PWT (r=0.3; p<0.001), IVST (r=0.3; p<0.001), LVMM (r=0.3; p<0.001), LVMMI (r=0.3; p<0.001), and blood glucose (r=0.2; p<0.01).

Conclusion      In patients with AH, a large QRS-T spatial angle is related with significantly higher values of SBP and DBP, LV dimension, blood glucose, and body mass index.

1. Chazova I.E., Zhernakova Yu.V. Clinical guidelines Diagnosis and treatment of arterial hypertension. Systemic Hypertension. 2019;16(1):6–31. DOI: 10.26442/2075082X.2019.1.190179

2. Oshchepkova E.V., Lazareva N.V., Chazova I.E. Quality assessment of examination of patients with arterial hypertension in primary health care (according to the Russian arterial hypertension register data). Systemic Hypertension. 2017;14(2):29–34. DOI: 10.26442/2075-082X_14.2.29-34

3. You Z, He T, Ding Y, Yang L, Jiang X, Huang L. Predictive value of electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy in the general population: A meta-analysis. Journal of Electrocardiology. 2020;62:14–9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2020.07.001

4. Zhang H, Hu L, Wei X. Prognostic value of left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertensive patients: A meta‐analysis of electrocardiographic studies. The Journal of Clinical Hypertension. 2020;22(2):254–60. DOI: 10.1111/jch.13795

5. Yi S, Wang F, Wan M, Yi X, Zhang Y, Sun S. Prediction of stroke with electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertensive patients: A meta-analysis. Journal of Electrocardiology. 2020;61:27–31. DOI: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2020.04.018

6. Estes EH, Zhang Z-M, Li Y, Tereschenko LG, Soliman EZ. The Romhilt-Estes left ventricular hypertrophy score and its components predict all-cause mortality in the general population. American Heart Journal. 2015;170(1):104–9. DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2015.04.004

7. Estes EH, Zhang Z-M, Li Y, Tereshchenko LG, Soliman EZ. Individual components of the Romhilt-Estes left ventricular hypertrophy score differ in their prediction of cardiovascular events: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study. American Heart Journal. 2015;170(6):1220–6. DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2015.09.016

8. Lehtonen AO, Puukka P, Varis J, Porthan K, Tikkanen JT, Nieminen MS et al. Prevalence and prognosis of ECG abnormalities in normotensive and hypertensive individuals. Journal of Hypertension. 2016;34(5):959–66. DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000000882

9. Vinyoles E, Soldevila N, Torras J, Olona N, de la Figuera M. Prognostic value of non-specific ST-T changes and left ventricular hypertrophy electrocardiographic criteria in hypertensive patients: 16-year followup results from the MINACOR cohort. BMC Cardiovascular Disorders. 2015;15(1):24. DOI: 10.1186/s12872-015-0012-6

10. Blinova E.V., Sakhnova T.A., Yurasova E.S. Diagnostic and prognostic significance of QRS-T angle. Therapeutic Archive. 2020;92(9):85–93. DOI: 10.26442/00403660.2020.09.000752

11. Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V, Afilalo J, Armstrong A, Ernande L et al. Recommendations for Cardiac Chamber Quantification by Echocardiography in Adults: An Update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography. 2015;28(1):1-39.e14. DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2014.10.003

12. Zhang X, Zhu Q, Zhu L, Jiang H, Xie J, Huang W et al. Spatial/Frontal QRS-T Angle Predicts All-Cause Mortality and Cardiac Mortality: A Meta-Analysis. PLOS ONE. 2015;10(8):e0136174. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136174

13. Voulgari C, Moyssakis I, Perrea D, Kyriaki D, Katsilambros N, Tentolouris N. The association between the spatial QRS-T angle with cardiac autonomic neuropathy in subjects with Type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetic Medicine. 2010;27(12):1420–9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2010.03120.x

14. Sakhnova T.A., Blinova E.V., Merkulova I.N., Shakhnovich R.M., Zhukova N.S., Sukhinina T.S. et al. Factors Associated with the Increase in Spatial and Frontal QRS-T Angles in Patients with Inferior Myocardial Infarction. Kardiologiia. 2020;60(11):76–83. DOI: 10.18087/cardio.2020.11.n1295

15. Tanriverdi Z, Unal B, Eyuboglu M, Bingol Tanriverdi T, Nurdag A, Demirbag R. The importance of frontal QRS-T angle for predicting non-dipper status in hypertensive patients without left ventricular hypertrophy. Clinical and Experimental Hypertension. 2018;40(4):318–23. DOI: 10.1080/10641963.2017.1377214

16. Nakamura N, Hirata K, Imanishi T, Kuroi A, Arita Y, Ikejima H et al. Electrocardiographic strain and endomyocardial radial strain in hypertensive patients. International Journal of Cardiology. 2011;150(3):319–24. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2010.04.049

17. Nishikage T, Takeuchi M, Nakai H, Otsuji Y, Lang RM. Possible link between strain ST-T change on the electrocardiogram and subendocardial dysfunction assessed by two-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography. European Journal of Echocardiography. 2010;11(5):451–9. DOI: 10.1093/ejechocard/jeq001