The modified protocol of transesophageal atrial pacing in stress echocardiography as an alternative way to increase the information value of the method for detection of ischemic wall motion abnormalities

Aim    To develop a new, modified protocol for transesophageal atrial electric stimulation (TEAES), which would significantly enhance the diagnostic value of stress echocardiography and reduce the duration of the test in patients with ischemic heart disease (IHD).
Material and methods    This study included 101 patients (80 men and 21 women aged 55±9 years) with suspected or documented diagnosis of IHD who were divided into two homogenous groups. Group 1 (51 patients) underwent stress echocardiography (stress-EchoCG) according to a standard protocol (SP) for TEAES and group 2 (50 patients), underwent stress-EchoCG according to a modified protocol (MP). In addition to stress-EchoCG with TEAES, selective coronary angiography was performed for all patients. The development of the new method for evaluating occult coronary insufficiency was based on comparison of SP and MP for TEAES with stress-EchoCG with data of coronary angiography.
Results    In both groups, significant differences in values of systolic and diastolic blood pressure were absent. However, the values of achieved heart rate were significantly different: 141±11 (TEAES SP) and 155±10 (TEAES MP) bpm (p=0.01). There was also a difference in the duration of the TEAES protocols: 15±3 and 5±2 min, respectively (p=0.006). The use of the modified TEAES protocol for detecting transient disorders of left ventricular myocardial local contractility increased the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the test from 76 %, 87 %, and 80 % to 83 %, 92 %, and 86 %, respectively. The most significant differences were found in the area supplied by the circumflex artery: the SP and MP sensitivities were 63 % and 75 %, respectively (p<0.05) and the SP and MP accuracies were 81 % and 90 %, respectively (p<0.05).
Conclusion    Evaluation of occult coronary insufficiency by stress-EchoCG with the TEAES MP as compared to the TEAES SP provides a gentler procedure regimen for the patient due to a shorter duration of the test and at the same time improves the diagnostic significance of this method in IHD patients.

1. Knuuti J, Wijns W, Saraste A, Capodanno D, Barbato E, FunckBrentano C et al. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes. European Heart Journal. 2020;41(3):407–77. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz425

2. Feigenbaum H. Stress echocardiography: an overview. Herz. 1991;16(5):347–54. PMID: 1757060

3. Metz LD, Beattie M, Hom R, Redberg RF, Grady D, Fleischmann KE. The Prognostic Value of Normal Exercise Myocardial Perfusion Imaging and Exercise Echocardiography. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2007;49(2):227–37. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.08.048

4. Shaw LJ, Marwick TH, Berman DS, Sawada S, Heller GV, Vasey C et al. Incremental cost-effectiveness of exercise echocardiography vs. SPECT imaging for the evaluation of stable chest pain. European Heart Journal. 2006;27(20):2448–58. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehl204

5. Geleijnse M, Elhendy A. Can Stress Echocardiography Compete with Perfusion Scintigraphy in the Detection of Coronary Artery Disease and Cardiac Risk Assessment? European Journal of Echocardiography. 2000;1(1):12–21. DOI: 10.1053/euje.2000.0008

6. Sicari R, Nihoyannopoulos P, Evangelista A, Kasprzak J, Lancellotti P, Poldermans D et al. Stress echocardiography expert consensus statement: European Association of Echocardiography (EAE) (a registered branch of the ESC). European Journal of Echocardiography. 2008;9(4):415–37. DOI: 10.1093/ejechocard/jen175

7. Marwick TH, Nemec JJ, Pashkow FJ, Stewart WJ, Salcedo EE. Accuracy and limitations of exercise echocardiography in a routine clinical setting. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 1992;19(1):74–81. DOI: 10.1016/0735-1097(92)90054-Q

8. Dagianti A, Penco M, Agati L, Sciomer S, Dagianti A, Rosanio S et al. Stress echocardiography: Comparison of exercise, dipyridamole and dobutamine in detecting and predicting the extent of coronary artery disease. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 1995;26(1):18–25. DOI: 10.1016/0735-1097(95)00121-F

9. Geleijnse ML, Fioretti PM, Roelandt JRTC. Methodology, Feasibility, Safety and Diagnostic Accuracy of Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 1997;30(3):595–606. DOI: 10.1016/S0735-1097(97)00206-4

10. Marcovitz PA, Shayna V, Horn RA, Hepner A, Armstrong WF. Value of dobutamine stress echocardiography in determining the prognosis of patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. The American Journal of Cardiology. 1996;78(4):404–8. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(96)00327-x

11. Picano E. Dipyridamole-echocardiography test: historical background and physiologic basis. European Heart Journal. 1989;10(4):365–76. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a059494

12. Chapman PD, Doyle TP, Troup PJ, Gross CM, Wann LS. Stress echocardiography with transesophageal atrial pacing: preliminary report of a new method for detection of ischemic wall motion abnormalities. Circulation. 1984;70(3):445–50. DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.70.3.445

13. Atar S, Nagai T, Cercek B, Naqvi TZ, Luo H, Siegel RJ. Pacing stress echocardiography: an alternative to pharmacologic stress testing. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2000;36(6):1935–41. DOI: 10.1016/S0735-1097(00)00964-5

14. Don Michael TA, Antonescu A, Bhambi B, Balasingam S. Accuracy and usefulness of atrial pacing in conjunction with transthoracic echocardiography in the detection of cardiac ischemia. The American Journal of Cardiology. 1996;77(2):187–90. DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9149(96)90594-9

15. Marangelli V, Iliceto S, Piccinni G, De Martino G, Sorgente L, Rizzon P. Detection of coronary artery disease by digital stress echocardiography: Comparison of exercise, transesophageal atrial pacing and dipyridamole echocardiography. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 1994;24(1):117–24. DOI: 10.1016/0735-1097(94)90551-7

16. Lee C-Y, Pellikka PA, McCully RB, Mahoney DW, Seward JB. Nonexercise stress transthoracic echocardiography: transesophageal atrial pacing versus dobutamine stress. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 1999;33(2):506–11. DOI: 10.1016/S0735-1097(98)00599-3

17. Schröder K, Völler H, Dingerkus H, Münzberg H, Dissmann R, Linderer T et al. Comparison of the diagnostic potential of four echocardiographic stress tests shortly after acute myocardial infarction: submaximal exercise, transesophageal atrial pacing, dipyridamole, and dobutamine-atropine. The American Journal of Cardiology. 1996;77(11):909–14. DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9149(96)00027-6

18. Picano E, Alaimo A, Chubuchny V, Plonska E, Baldo V, Baldini U et al. Noninvasive pacemaker stress echocardiography for diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2002;40(7):1305–10. DOI: 10.1016/S0735-1097(02)02157-5

19. Golikov A.P., Ovchinnikov V.P., Belozerov G.E., Skorohodov S.I. Variants of the course of the stress test with atrial stimulation in comparison with the angiographic picture of the coronary arteries. Kardiologiia. 1996;36(12):18–22.

20. Picano E. Stress echocardiography. 6th ed. – London: Springer International Publishing;2015. – 689 p. ISBN 978-3-319- 20957-9

21. Saidova M.A., Botvina Ju.V., Shitov V.N. Method of identifying latent coronary artery disease in patients with ischemic heart disease. Patent RU 2 502 465 C1. Application: 2012125644/14/2012.06.20. Av. at: https://patents.s3.yandex.net/RU2502465C1_20131227.pdf.