ВАЖНО! Правила приравнивания журналов, входящих в международные базы данных к журналам перечня ВАК.
Ответ на официальный запрос в ВАК журнала Кардиология.

Preview

Kardiologiia

Advanced search

Prognostic significance of arterial stiffness parameters in the identification of very high-risk patients

Abstract

Over the past few decades, much attention has been paid to the study of the properties of the vascular wall and its role in predicting cardiovascular events. The testing of new indicators characterizing cardiovascular risk is being actively conducted. The study included 288 men aged 40 to 60 years (mean age 51.6 ± 6.2 years). Among the examined 133 people belonged to the category of very high cardiovascular risk (they suffered myocardial infarction for no more than 5 years before inclusion in the study), and 155 patients did not have a history of cardiovascular complications. Using the Fukuda denshi VS-1500 VaSera sphygmograph, a cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI) and augmentation index (AI) were obtained. A model of multivariate logistic regression was constructed for the probability of assigning the patient to a group of very high risk, as well as ROC analysis. The study demonstrated the statistically significant role of CAVI in predicting the assignment of patients to a group of very high cardiovascular risk (after myocardial infarction). An increase in the odds ratio of assigning a patient to this group with an increase in CAVI per unit is 1.417. According to the results of ROC analysis, the prognostic role of CAVI (AUC 0.70) is slightly inferior to age (AUC 0.75), but exceeds AI (AUC 0.641). The share of variability in the probability of classifying patients as a very high risk group from the influence of the studied factors is 31%. The overall quality of the predictive model can be rated as good (AUC = 0.77).

About the Authors

A. E. Nosov
Federal Research Center for Medical and Preventive Health Risk Management Technologies
Russian Federation
Head of Inpatient Department, Clinic of Occupational Medicine, PhD


O. Yu. Gorbushina
Federal Research Center for Medical and Preventive Health Risk Management Technologies
Russian Federation
, Department, Clinic of Occupational Medicine, therapist


E. M. Vlasova
Federal Research Center for Medical and Preventive Health Risk Management Technologies
Russian Federation
Head of the center of occupational pathology, PhD


V. B. Alekseev
Federal Research Center for Medical and Preventive Health Risk Management Technologies
Russian Federation
Director Center, PhD


References

1. Arnett DK, Blumenthal RS, Albert MA, Buroker AB, Goldberger ZD, Hahn EJ et al. 2019 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2019;140(11):e596–646. DOI: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000678

2. Williams B, Mancia G, Spiering W, Agabiti Rosei E, Azizi M, Burnier M et al. 2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. European Heart Journal. 2018;39(33):3021–104. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy339

3. Chazova I.E., Zhernakova Yu.V. Clinical guidelines Diagnosis and treatment of arterial hypertension. Systemic Hypertension. 2019;16(1):6–31. DOI: 10.26442/2075082X.2019.1.190179

4. Shirai K, Utino J, Otsuka K, Takata M. A Novel Blood Pressure-independent Arterial Wall Stiffness Parameter; Cardio-Ankle Vascular Index (CAVI). Journal of Atherosclerosis and Thrombosis. 2006;13(2):101–7. DOI: 10.5551/jat.13.101

5. Namba T, Masaki N, Takase B, Adachi T. Arterial Stiffness Assessed by Cardio-Ankle Vascular Index. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2019;20(15):3664. DOI: 10.3390/ijms20153664

6. Shirai K, Hiruta N, Song M, Kurosu T, Suzuki J, Tomaru T et al. Cardio-Ankle Vascular Index (CAVI) as a Novel Indicator of Arterial Stiffness: Theory, Evidence and Perspectives. Journal of Atherosclerosis and Thrombosis. 2011;18(11):924–38. DOI: 10.5551/jat.7716

7. Vasyuk Yu.A., Ivanova S.V., Shkolnik E.L., Kotovskaya Yu.V., Milyagin V.A., Oleynikov V.E. et al. Consensus of Russian experts on the evaluation of arterial stiffness in clinical practice. Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention. 2016;15(2):4–19. DOI: 10.15829/1728-8800-2016-2-4-19

8. Bonarjee VVS. Arterial Stiffness: A Prognostic Marker in Coronary Heart Disease. Available Methods and Clinical Application. Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine. 2018;5:64. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2018.00064

9. Urazalina S.J., Musagalieva A.T., Usaeva G.R., Berkinbaev S.F. Analysis of Relationship Between Parameters of Arterial Stiffness and Lipid Profile in Patients With Metabolic Syndrome. Kardiologiia. 2018;58(10):19–26. DOI: 10.18087/cardio.2018.10.10181

10. Trifonova S.S., Gaisenok O.V., Sidorenko B.A. Application of methods of assessment of vascular stiffness in clinical practice: the possibility of cardio-ankle vascular index. Kardiologiia. 2015;55(4):61–6.

11. Namekata T, Suzuki K, Ishizuka N, Shirai K. Establishing baseline criteria of cardio-ankle vascular index as a new indicator of arteriosclerosis: a cross-sectional study. BMC Cardiovascular Disorders. 2011;11(1):51. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2261-11-51

12. Park HE, Choi S-Y, Kim MK, Oh B-H. Cardio-ankle vascular index reflects coronary atherosclerosis in patients with abnormal glucose metabolism: Assessment with 256 slice multi-detector computed tomography. Journal of Cardiology. 2012;60(5):372–6. DOI: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2012.07.005

13. Nakamura K, Tomaru T, Yamamura S, Miyashita Y, Shirai K, Noike H. Cardio-Ankle Vascular Index is a Candidate Predictor of Coronary Atherosclerosis. Circulation Journal. 2007;72(4):598–604. DOI: 10.1253/circj.72.598

14. Tanaka A, Tomiyama H, Maruhashi T, Matsuzawa Y, Miyoshi T, Kabutoya T et al. Physiological Diagnostic Criteria for Vascular Failure. Hypertension. 2018;72(5):1060–71. DOI: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.118.11554

15. Gohbara M, Iwahashi N, Sano Y, Akiyama E, Maejima N, Tsukahara K et al. Clinical Impact of the Cardio-Ankle Vascular Index for Predicting Cardiovascular Events After Acute Coronary Syndrome. Circulation Journal. 2016;80(6):1420–6. DOI: 10.1253/circj.CJ-15-1257

16. Sato Y, Nagayama D, Saiki A, Watanabe R, Watanabe Y, Imamura H et al. Cardio-Ankle Vascular Index is Independently Associated with Future Cardiovascular Events in Outpatients with Metabolic Disorders. Journal of Atherosclerosis and Thrombosis. 2016;23(5):596– 605. DOI: 10.5551/jat.31385

17. Satoh-Asahara N, Kotani K, Yamakage H, Yamada T, Araki R, Okajima T et al. Cardio-ankle vascular index predicts for the incidence of cardiovascular events in obese patients: A multicenter prospective cohort study ( Japan Obesity and Metabolic Syndrome Study: JOMS). Atherosclerosis. 2015;242(2):461–8. DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2015.08.003

18. Chung S-L, Yang C-C, Chen C-C, Hsu Y-C, Lei M-H. Coronary Artery Calcium Score Compared with Cardio-Ankle Vascular Index in the Prediction of Cardiovascular Events in Asymptomatic Patients with Type 2 Diabetes. Journal of Atherosclerosis and Thrombosis. 2015;22(12):1255–65. DOI: 10.5551/jat.29926

19. Otsuka K, Fukuda S, Shimada K, Suzuki K, Nakanishi K, Yoshiyama M et al. Serial assessment of arterial stiffness by cardio-ankle vascular index for prediction of future cardiovascular events in patients with coronary artery disease. Hypertension Research. 2014;37(11):1014– 20. DOI: 10.1038/hr.2014.116

20. Matsushita K, Ding N, Kim ED, Budoff M, Chirinos JA, Fernhall B et al. Cardio-ankle vascular index and cardiovascular disease: Systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective and cross-sectional studies. The Journal of Clinical Hypertension. 2019;21(1):16–24. DOI: 10.1111/jch.13425

21. Tanaka A, Tomiyama H, Maruhashi T, Matsuzawa Y, Miyoshi T, Kabutoya T et al. Official Announcement of Physiological Diagnostic Criteria for Vascular Failure from the Japanese Society for Vascular Failure. Vascular Failure. 2018;2(2):59–60. DOI: 10.30548/vascfail.2.2_59

22. Kabutoya T, Kario K. Comparative Assessment of Cutoffs for theCardio-Ankle Vascular Index and Brachial-Ankle Pulse Wave Velocity inaNationwide Registry: A Cardiovascular Prognostic Coupling Study. Pulse. 2018;6(3–4):131–6. DOI: 10.1159/000489604

23. Ohkuma T, Tomiyama H, Ninomiya T, Kario K, Hoshide S, Kita Y et al. Proposed Cutoff Value of Brachial-Ankle Pulse Wave Velocity for the Management of Hypertension. Circulation Journal. 2017;81(10):1540–2. DOI: 10.1253/circj.CJ-17-0636

24. Chirinos JA, Kips JG, Jacobs DR, Brumback L, Duprez DA, Kronmal R et al. Arterial Wave Reflections and Incident Cardiovascular Events and Heart Failure. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2012;60(21):2170–7. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.07.054

25. Townsend RR. Arterial Stiffness: Recommendations and Standardization. Pulse. 2016;4(1):3–7. DOI: 10.1159/000448454

26. Laurent S, Cockcroft J, Van Bortel L, Boutouyrie P, Giannattasio C, Hayoz D et al. Expert consensus document on arterial stiffness: methodological issues and clinical applications. European Heart Journal. 2006;27(21):2588–605. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehl254

27. Patvardhan E, Heffernan KS, Ruan J, Hession M, Warner P, Karas RH et al. Augmentation Index Derived from Peripheral Arterial Tonometry Correlates with Cardiovascular Risk Factors. Cardiology Research and Practice. 2011;2011:1–6. DOI: 10.4061/2011/253758


Review

For citations:


Nosov A.E., Gorbushina O.Yu., Vlasova E.M., Alekseev V.B. Prognostic significance of arterial stiffness parameters in the identification of very high-risk patients. Kardiologiia. 2020;60(10):27-32.

Views: 9924


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0022-9040 (Print)
ISSN 2412-5660 (Online)