Dynamics of the clinical functional and hemodynamic profile of patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension with initial monotherapy with endothelin receptor antagonists: bosentan vs. macitentan
https://doi.org/10.18087/cardio.2020.7.n1136
Abstract
Aim To compare results of 24-h treatments with bosentan and macitentan by the clinical functional status and indexes of pulmonary hemodynamics in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH).
Materials and methods Based on the Russian National Registry (NCT03707561), 44 patients older than 18 years with PAH (34 patients with idiopathic pulmonary hypertension (IPH) and 10 patients with Eisenmenger syndrome) were retrospectively included into this study. Based on the statistical method of pairwise comparison, two groups were formed and matched by age, gender, WHO functional class (FC), and 6-min walk distance (6MWD). 22 patients of group 1 (17 with IPH and 5 with Eisenmenger syndrome) were treated with macitentan 10 mg/day, and 22 patients of group 2 (17 with IPH and 5 with Eisenmenger syndrome) were treated with bosentan 250 mg/day. Clinical instrumental data (6MWD, Borg dyspnea score, chest X-ray, transthoracic echocardiography (EchoCG), and right heart catheterization (RHC)) were evaluated at baseline and after 24 weeks of therapy.
Results By week 24 of the treatment, FC and 6MWD improved in both groups. The macitentan treatment was associated with a significant decrease in Borg score. Significant intergroup differences in EchoCG data were not observed. The bosentan treatment was associated with a decrease in right ventricular (RV) dimension and a tendency towards a decrease in calculated pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP). By week 24, the macitentan treatment as compared to the bosentan treatment, was associated with a decrease in cardiothoracic ratio (CTR). In both groups, RHC showed decreases in PASP, mean pulmonary artery pressure and pulmonary vascular resistance, and improvements in cardiac output (CO), cardiac index, and stroke volume (SV) values. By week 24, the increase in SV was greater in the macitentan treatment group than in the bosentan treatment group (р=0.05).
Conclusion The 24-week treatment with bosentan or macitentan provided significant and comparable improvement of the functional profile in PAH patients with FC II (WHO) at baseline. The decrease in CTR was significantly more pronounced in the macitental treatment group compared to the bosentan treatment group. The 24-week bosentan treatment resulted in a decrease in RV anterior-posterior dimension, a tendency towards a decrease in PASP according to EchoCG data. Macitentan provided more pronounced dynamics of dyspnea than bosentan according to the results of 6MWD test and the increase in SV according to RHC data.
Keywords
About the Authors
T. V. MartynyukRussian Federation
A. M. Aleevskaya
Russian Federation
References
1. Galiè N, Humbert M, Vachiery J-L, Gibbs S, Lang I, Torbicki A et al. 2015 ESC/ERS Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension: The Joint Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pulmonary Hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Respiratory Society (ERS): Endorsed by: Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC), International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT). European Heart Journal. 2016;37(1):67–119. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv317
2. Martynyuk T.V. Pulmonary hypertension: diagnosis and treatment. – M.: LLC Medical news Agency;2018. - 304 p. ISBN 978-5-604-00080-9
3. Chazova I.E., Avdeev S.N., Tsareva N.A., Volkov A.V., Martynyuk T.V., Nakonechnikov S.N. Clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension. Therapeutic archive. 2014;86(9):4–23.
4. Pulido T, Adzerikho I, Channick RN, Delcroix M, Galiè N, Ghofrani H-A et al. Macitentan and Morbidity and Mortality in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. New England Journal of Medicine. 2013;369(9):809–18. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1213917
5. Clozel M, Breu V, Burri K, Cassal J-M, Fischli W, Gray GA et al. Pathophysiological role of endothelin revealed by the first orally active endothelin receptor antagonist. Nature. 1993;365(6448):759–61. DOI: 10.1038/365759a0
6. Stewart DJ. Endothelin in cardiopulmonary disease: factor paracrine vs neurohumoral. European Heart Journal. 1993;14(Suppl I):48–54. PMID: 7904941
7. Iglarz M, Binkert C, Morrison K, Fischli W, Gatfield J, Treiber A et al. Pharmacology of Macitentan, an Orally Active Tissue-Targeting Dual Endothelin Receptor Antagonist. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics. 2008;327(3):736–45. DOI: 10.1124/ jpet.108.142976
8. Raja SG. Macitentan, a tissue-targeting endothelin receptor antagonist for the potential oral treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Current Opinion in Investigational Drugs. 2010;11(9):1066–73. PMID: 20730702
9. Wagner OF, Christ G, Wojta J, Vierhapper H, Parzer S, Nowotny PJ et al. Polar secretion of endothelin-1 by cultured endothelial cells. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1992;267(23):16066–8. PMID: 1644793
10. Martynyuk T.V., Nakonechnikov S.N., Chazova I.E. Optimization of specific therapy for pulmonary arterial hypertension: the possibilities of using endothelin receptor antagonists. Eurasian Cardiology Journal. 2017;2:20–7.
11. Channick RN, Simonneau G, Sitbon O, Robbins IM, Frost A, Tapson VF et al. Effects of the dual endothelin-receptor antagonist bosentan in patients with pulmonary hypertension: a randomised placebocontrolled study. The Lancet. 2001;358(9288):1119–23. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)06250-X
12. Martynyuk T.V., Arkhipova O.A., Kobal E.A., Eruslanova K.A., Danilov N.M., Chazova I.E. Use of non-selective endothelin receptor antagonist bosentan in patients with idiopathic pulmonary hypertension: the first Russian experience and look into the future. Systemic Hypertension. 2011;8(4):51–7.
13. Galiè N, Jansa P, Pulido T, Channick RN, Delcroix M, Ghofrani H-A et al. SERAPHIN haemodynamic substudy: the effect of the dual endothelin receptor antagonist macitentan on haemodynamic parameters and NT-proBNP levels and their association with disease progression in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. European Heart Journal. 2017;38(15):1147–55. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx025
14. Tahara N, Dobashi H, Fukuda K, Funauchi M, Hatano M, Ikeda S et al. Efficacy and Safety of a Novel Endothelin Receptor Antagonist, Macitentan, in Japanese Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. Circulation Journal. 2016;80(6):1478–83. DOI: 10.1253/circj.CJ-15-1305
Review
For citations:
Martynyuk T.V., Aleevskaya A.M. Dynamics of the clinical functional and hemodynamic profile of patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension with initial monotherapy with endothelin receptor antagonists: bosentan vs. macitentan. Kardiologiia. 2020;60(7):28-35. https://doi.org/10.18087/cardio.2020.7.n1136